期刊文献+

Preference and adoption of Farmer Field School (FFS) Prosopis juliflora management practices: Experiences in Baringo District, Kenya

Preference and adoption of Farmer Field School (FFS) Prosopis juliflora management practices: Experiences in Baringo District, Kenya
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This research was carried out to evaluate the preference and adoption of harvesting, uprooting, stump burning, pruning and thinning practices for controlling the spread ofProsopisjuliflora (prosopis) within Marigat Division of the Baringo District, Kenya. A survey methodology was employed using a random sample of 25 Farmer Field School (FFS) members and 5 non=FFS members from each of the five locations of Marigat Division. In total, 100 FFS members and 25 non-FFS members participated in the study; addi- tional supplementary data were collected from the Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI), a major facilitator and trainer of the identified FFS activities and practices in the study area since 2004. More than 80% of the local community never undertook any form of prosopis management practice; however, this changed after FFS training, indicating an acquisition and retention of knowledge which probably diffused to the non-FFS counterparts, through either formal or informal ways. Harvesting was the most preferred (100%) and stump burning the least preferred (46%) practice of managing the spread of prosopis. The success and preference of any prosopis management practice was attributed to wood and non-wood benefits derived from prosopis and growing of animal fodder and food crops on rehabilitated land. More than 80% of respondents attributed ineffectiveness of any prosopis management practice to coppicing and viable seed banks of the tree, while 50% highlighted a lack of consistency and integration in carrying out manage- ment practices. The reported negative attitude towards prosopis changed after training with none of the view to eradicate it. Labor intensity and frequent regeneration of seedlings were identified as the major challenges faced during the implementation of proso- pis management practices. In conclusion, the study shows that harvesting, uprooting, stump burning, pruning and thinning realized through consistent holistic integration contribute to containing the spread of prosopis trees in Baringo, Kenya. This research was carried out to evaluate the preference and adoption of harvesting, uprooting, stump burning, pruning and thinning practices for controlling the spread ofProsopisjuliflora (prosopis) within Marigat Division of the Baringo District, Kenya. A survey methodology was employed using a random sample of 25 Farmer Field School (FFS) members and 5 non=FFS members from each of the five locations of Marigat Division. In total, 100 FFS members and 25 non-FFS members participated in the study; addi- tional supplementary data were collected from the Kenya Forestry Research Institute (KEFRI), a major facilitator and trainer of the identified FFS activities and practices in the study area since 2004. More than 80% of the local community never undertook any form of prosopis management practice; however, this changed after FFS training, indicating an acquisition and retention of knowledge which probably diffused to the non-FFS counterparts, through either formal or informal ways. Harvesting was the most preferred (100%) and stump burning the least preferred (46%) practice of managing the spread of prosopis. The success and preference of any prosopis management practice was attributed to wood and non-wood benefits derived from prosopis and growing of animal fodder and food crops on rehabilitated land. More than 80% of respondents attributed ineffectiveness of any prosopis management practice to coppicing and viable seed banks of the tree, while 50% highlighted a lack of consistency and integration in carrying out manage- ment practices. The reported negative attitude towards prosopis changed after training with none of the view to eradicate it. Labor intensity and frequent regeneration of seedlings were identified as the major challenges faced during the implementation of proso- pis management practices. In conclusion, the study shows that harvesting, uprooting, stump burning, pruning and thinning realized through consistent holistic integration contribute to containing the spread of prosopis trees in Baringo, Kenya.
出处 《Forestry Studies in China》 CAS 2012年第4期283-290,共8页 中国林学(英文版)
关键词 Prosopisjuliflora Farmer Field School management practices Baringo Kenya Prosopisjuliflora, Farmer Field School, management practices, Baringo, Kenya
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Andersson S. 2005. Spread of the introduced tree species Pro- sopis juliflora (Sw.) DC in the Lake Baringo area, Kenya. Institutionen for Skoglig Vegetationsekologi SLU, UMEA, Sweden.
  • 2Asiabaka C. 2002. Promoting sustainable extension approach- es: Farmer Field School (FFS) and its role in sustainable agricultural development in Africa. Int J Agric Rural Dev, 3: 46-53.
  • 3Binggeli P. 2001. The human dimension of invasive woody plants. In: McNeely J A, ed. The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN, 145-160.
  • 4Braun A, Duveskog D. 2008. The Farmer Field School ap- proach - History, global assessment and success stories. Background Paper for the IFAD Rural Poverty Report. Nai- robi, Kenya.
  • 5Braun A R, Jiggins J, RSling N, van den Berg H, Snijders E 2005. A global survey and review of Farmer Field School experiences. International Livestock Research Institute. Nai- robi, Kenya.
  • 6Choge'S K, "Chikamai B N. 2004. Experiences of prosopis utili- zation and management from outside Kenya. Proceedings of the Workshop on Integrated Management of Prosopis Spe- cies in Kenya. Soi Safari Club, Lake Baringo, Kenya, 78-92.
  • 7Choge S K, Odee D, Okeyo M. 2006. Management and control of Prosopis species in Kenya. Proceedings of the 3rd KEFRI Scientific Conference. Muguga, Kenya, 193-199.
  • 8Choge S K, Pasiecznik N M, Harvey M, Wright J, Awan S Z, Harris P J C. 2007. Prosopis pods as human food, with spe- cial reference to Kenya. Waters SA, 33(3): 419-424.
  • 9Endalew B D. 2009. Effectiveness of Farmer Field School in promoting coffee management practices: The case of Jimma and Sidama zones, Ethiopia. Dissertation for the Master De- gree. Ethiopia, Kenya: Haramaya University.
  • 10Esbenshade H W, Grainger A. 1980. The Bamburi reclamation project. Inter Tree Crops J, 1:199-202.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部