摘要
目的:客观评价推拿治疗小儿泄泻伤食证的疗效优势。方法:采用多中心、分层区组随机、平行对照临床研究方法。由3个中心协作完成小儿急性泄泻伤食证111例,包括试验组(推拿治疗)80例、对照组(思密达和培菲康治疗)31例。袪除脱落病例后,试验组76例、对照组30例。结果:治疗2个疗程(6d)后统计,试验组疗效显著优于对照组(P<0.01)。试验组在主症(大便次数、质地、性状、质量)的恢复正常时间方面显著早于对照组(P<0.01)。结论:推拿辨证疗法治疗小儿泄泻伤食证疗效优于西药(思密达+培菲康),且起效时间较早。
Objective： To evaluate curative effect of tuina treatment objectively on children with diarrhea due to food damage.Methods： Multi-center,stratified randomization and concurrent control methods were adopted.111 cases with food damage syndrome were observed in three centers.Except for 4 amotic cases in the test group and 1 amotic case in the control group,there were 76 cases in the test group and 30 cases in the control group totally.Results： The total effect after one treatment course in the test group was significantly better than that in the control group（P0.01）.There were statistically significant difference in recovery of dominant symptoms between two groups and the effect of test group was much earlier than that in control group（P0.01）.Conclusion： Tuina therapy is effective for children＇s diarrhea with food damage syndrome,which is better and has earlier effect than western medicine（Smectite and Bifico） and should be popularized in clinic.
出处
《中华中医药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第1期275-277,共3页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
基金
国家中医药管理局中医药科学技术研究专项课题(No.2009ZL25)~~
关键词
伤食泻
推拿
多中心随机对照
生存分析
临床研究、
Food damage syndrome
Tuina
Multi-center
stratified randomization and equal control
Survival analysis
Clinical research
