期刊文献+

基于TTC及DRAC的高速公路施工区追尾冲突研究 被引量:15

Rear-end Conflict of Freeway Work Zone Based on TTC and DRAC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对高速公路施工区的交通安全问题以及施工区普遍存在的持续时间较短、积累的事故数据难于满足统计分析要求的现实情况,探讨了基于交通冲突替代交通事故的交通安全分析方法。通过采集和分析处理高速公路半幅封闭施工区和单向超车道封闭施工区合流段和施工区段的车型、车速、车头时距等基于车辆个体的交通参数数据,提出了基于避免碰撞时间(TTC)的追尾冲突数计算方法和基于避免碰撞减速度(DRAC)的追尾风险度计算方法。应用上述方法评价了典型施工区合流段和施工区段的追尾冲突状况。研究结果表明,2种事故数据替代方法均可从不同侧面量化描述追尾冲突的发生状态。 Since the duration of freeway work zone is short and the accidents during this period can not meet the requirement of statistical analysis,the traffic conflict technique is employed to analyze the safety situation of freeway work zone.Firstly,the traffic data of vehicles through the merging area and working area of the closed one-way work zone and closed passing-lane work zone are collected and analyzed.These data include the vehicle type,speed,time headway and others based on the features of individual vehicle.Secondly,two methodologies are developed.The first is based on time to collision(TTC),which can calculate the rear-end conflict number,while the second is based on deceleration rate to avoid crash(DRAC),which can determine the rear-end risk.Furthermore,the rear-end conflict situation of the typical work zones' merging area and working area is evaluated by the methodologies mentioned above.The results show that these surrogate measures can quantitatively describe the rear-end conflict situation from different aspects.
出处 《交通信息与安全》 2012年第6期6-10,共5页 Journal of Transport Information and Safety
基金 黑龙江省交通厅科技项目(批准号:2010-2012)资助
关键词 追尾冲突 碰撞时间 避免碰撞减速度 施工区 高速公路 rear-end conflict TTC DRAC work zone freeway
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1周伟,罗石贵.路段交通事故多发点的冲突判定方法[J].中国公路学报,2000,13(1):81-86. 被引量:40
  • 2孙日双,白辂韬,白翰.基于交通冲突技术的公路平面交叉口事故多发点鉴别方法研究[J].公路,2009,54(9):294-297. 被引量:4
  • 3姬利娜,王飞,成卫.基于交通冲突与灰色聚类的交叉口安全评价研究[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2012,36(3):641-644. 被引量:12
  • 4赵永红,白玉,杨晓光.基于Poisson过程的交通冲突预测模型研究[J].交通信息与安全,2011,29(1):8-11. 被引量:9
  • 5Minderhoud M M, Bovy P H L. Extended time to- collisions for road traffic safety assessment[J]. Ac cident Analysis and Prevention. 2001,33(1):89-97.
  • 6Vogel K. A comparison of headway and time to col lision as safety indicators[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2003,35(3) :427-433.
  • 7Archer J. Methods for the Assessment and Prediction of Traffic Safety at Urban Intersection and Their Ap- plication in Micro-simulation Modeling[D]. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, 2005.
  • 8Cunto F, Saccomanno F F. Microlevel traffic simu- lation method for assessing crash potential at inter- sections[C] // Washington D. C: Proceedings of the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Re search Board, Transportation Research Board 2007.
  • 9Meng Q, Weng J, Qu X. A probabilistic quantita- tive risk assessment model for the long-term work zone crashes[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2010,42(6) :1866-1877.
  • 10American Association of State Highway and Transpor- tation officials (AASHTO). A policy on geometric design of highways and streets[M]. Washington D. C. American Association of State Highway and Transpor tation Officials, 2004.

二级参考文献36

共引文献58

同被引文献143

引证文献15

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部