期刊文献+

腰椎融合术后邻近节段退变的临床研究现状 被引量:23

PRESENT CLINICAL RESEARCH SITUATION OF ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION AFTER LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对腰椎融合术后出现邻近节段退变(adjacent segment degeneration,ASD)的临床研究现状进行综述。方法查阅近年关于腰椎融合术后出现ASD的概念、发生率、相关影响因素和预防等方面的文献,并进行综述。结果 ASD的概念包括影像学ASD和临床症状ASD,腰椎融合术后影像学ASD发生率可达8%~100%,临床症状ASD发生率为5.2%~18.5%。ASD的发生与个体因素(年龄、性别、术前情况等)和手术因素(融合节段长短、融合术式、内固定使用、矢状面平衡、椎间隙过度撑开等)相关。术中减少融合节段、维持矢状面平衡以及非融合技术的应用可预防ASD的发生。结论腰椎融合术后ASD发生率增高。非融合技术的应用降低了ASD的发生率,取得了较好的近期临床效果,但也存在一些并发症,其中长期效果尚待进一步研究。 Objective To review the present clinical research situation of ad)acent segment degeneration (ASD) after lumbar spinal fusion. Methods The recent literature concerning ASD in the concept, the incidence, the risk factors, and prevention was reviewed. Results The concept of ASD includes radiographic ASD and clinical ASD. The incidences of radiographic ASD and clinical ASD were 8%-100% and 5.2%-18.5%, respectively. The risk factors for ASD include both patient and surgical factors. Patient factors include age, gender, preoperative condition, and so on. Surgical factors include the length of the fusion, mode of fusion, internal fixator, sagittal balance, excessive distraction of disc space, and so on. It can prevent ASD to reduce the length of the fusion, to keep sagittal balance, and to use the non-fusion technology. Conclusion Many researches have proved that the incidence of ASD is increased after lumbar spinal fusion, and it can be reduced by the non-fusion technology. Non-fusion technology has obtained good short-term results. But the |on,-term resnlt~ ~hn.lrl h,. fiwth,.~ ,~h A K ~. 1:~^.:__~
作者 双峰 侯树勋
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期110-115,共6页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 腰椎融合 邻近节段退变 并发症 Lumbar spinal fusion Adjacent segment degeneration Complication
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease fol-lowinglumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumen-tation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2007,32(20): 2253-2257.
  • 2Bambakidis NC, Feiz-Erfan I, Klopfenstein JD, et al Indications forsurgical fusion of the cervical and lumbar motion segment. Spine (PhilaPa 1976),2005, 30(16 Suppl): S2-S6.
  • 3Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, et al. Guidelines for the per-formance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbarspine. Part 5: correlation between radiographic and functional out-come. J Neurosurg Spine, 2005,2(6): 658-661.
  • 4Stoffel M,Behr M, Reinke A, et al. Pedicle screw-based dynamic sta-bilization of the thoracolumbar spine with the Cosmic-system: a pro-spective observation. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2010,152(5): 835-843.
  • 5Min JH, Jang JS, Jung B. et al. The clinical characteristics and risk fac-tors for the adjacent segment degeneration in instrumented lumbarfusion. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, 21(5): 305-309.
  • 6Park JY, Chin DK, Cho YE. Accelerated L5-Si segment degeneration af-ter spinal fusion on and above Lt-s: minimum 4-year Follow-up results.J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009,45(2): 81-84.
  • 7Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, et al. Lumbar adjacent segmentdegeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty.Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008,33(15): 1701-1707.
  • 8Hilibrand AS.Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adja-cent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J, 2004,4(6 Suppl): 190S-194S.
  • 9Kim JH, Kim SS, Suk SI. Incidence of proximal adjacent failure in adultlumbar deformity correction based on proximal fusion level. AsianSpine J’ 2007’ 1(1): 19-26.
  • 10Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee SW, et al Risk factors for adjacent segment dis-ease after lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J, 2009,18(11): 1637-1643.

二级参考文献41

  • 1Korovessis P, Repantis T, Zacharatos S, et al. Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion [ J ] ? Eur Spine J, 2009, 18(6): 830-40.
  • 2Yang JY, Lee JK, Song HS. The impact of adjacent segment degeneration on the clinical outcome after lumbar spinal fusion [J]. Spine, 2008, 33(5): 503-7.
  • 3Ekman P, Moiler H, Shalabi A, et al. A prospective randorniscd study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration[J]. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18(8): 1175-86.
  • 4Chosa E, Goto K, Totoribe K, et al. Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2004, 17(2): 134-9.
  • 5Park P, Garton H J, Gala V C, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature [J]. Spine, 2004, 29(17): 1938-44.
  • 6Bastian L, Lange U, Knop C, et al. Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study[J]. Eur Spine J, 2001, 10(4): 295-300.
  • 7Pellise F, Hemandez A, Vidal X, et al. Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion [J ]. Spine, 2007, 32(5): 574-9.
  • 8Okuda S, Oda T, Miyauchi A, et al. Lamina horizontalization and facet tropism as the risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF[J]. Spine), 2008, 33(25): 2754-8.
  • 9Park JY, Cho YE, Kuh SU, et al. New prognostic factors for adjacent-segment degeneration after one-stage-360 degrees fixation for spondylolytic spohdylolisthesis: special reference to the usefulness of pelvic incidence angle[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 7(2): 139-44.
  • 10Lai P L, Chen LH, Niu CC, et al. Relation between laminectomy and development of adjacent segment instability after lumbar fusion with pedicle fixation [ J ]. Spine, 2004, 29(22): 2527-32.

共引文献81

同被引文献206

引证文献23

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部