期刊文献+

刮切电凝法甲状腺手术与传统手术及超声刀辅助手术的临床效果比较 被引量:7

The clinical effect comparison among the scraping electrocoagulation thyroid operation,traditional thyroid operation and the surgery with ultrasonic scalpel
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨刮切电凝甲状腺手术与传统手术及超声刀辅助手术治疗良性甲状腺疾病的临床疗效。方法94例患者分为3组,刮切电凝组33例,传统手术组31例,超声刀辅助手术组30例,治疗完成后,对刮切电凝组与另两组相关临床指标进行分析比较。结果刮切电凝组在出血量、切口大小、手术时间、引流量与传统组相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组在术后住院时间、引流时间、并发症方面,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);刮切电凝组与超声刀辅助组相比,各项差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论刮切电凝法甲状腺手术是一种安全可靠的手术方式,具有切口小、创伤小及手术成本低等优点。 Objective To explore clinical therapeutic effect of benign thyroid diseases among scraping electrocoagula- tion, traditional method and ultrasonic scalpel. Methods All of 94 cases were divided into scraping electrocoagulation group, traditional group and the assistance of ultrasonic scalpel group, respectively of 33,31 and 30 cases. After the operation, the relevant clinical indexes were compared between scraping the electrocoagulation thyroid operation group and the other two groups. Results The operation,incision size, operation time and drainage after operation between scraping electrocoagulation group and traditional group had statistically significant (P 〈 0.05). Length of the hospitaliza tion time and drainage time,complications between the two groupshad no statistical significance (P 〉 0.05). The amount of bleeding in operation, operation time, incision size, drainage, length of the hospitalization time drainage time and complications had no statistical significance between scraping eleetrocoagulation group and the assistance of ultrasonic scalpel operation group (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Scraping electrocoagulation thyroid operation is a safe and reliable op- eration, and has the advantage of small incision, lesser trauma and lower operation cost.
出处 《中国现代医生》 2013年第1期28-29,32,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 甲状腺结节 刮切电凝法 甲状腺手术 Thyroid nodule Scraping electrocoagulation Thyroid operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献52

共引文献80

同被引文献52

  • 1Vanderpump MP. The epidemiology of thyroid disease [ J ]. Br Med Bull, 2011, 99: 39-51.
  • 2Lang BH, Ng SH, Lau LL, et al. A systematic review and meta-a- nalysis comparing the efficacy and surgical outcomes of total thy- roidectomy between harmonic scalpel versus ligasure[ J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2013,20(6) :1918-1926.
  • 3Cannizzaro MA, Bianco SL, Borzt L, et al. The use of FOCUSTM Harmonic scalpel compared to conventional haemostasis (knot and tie ligation) for thyroid surgery: a prospective randomized study [ J]. Springerplus ,2014,3:639.
  • 4All SM, Khan JS, Khan MM. Harmonic Scalpel vs. Knot tying in open Thyroidectomy[J]. Ann. Pak. Inst. Med. Sci, 2014, 10 ( 1 ) : 50-53.
  • 5Materazzi G, Caravaglios G, Matteucci V, et al. The impact of the Harmonic FOCUSTM on complications in thyroid surgery: a pro- spective multicenter study [ J ]. Updates Surg, 2013,65 ( 4 ) : 295- 299.
  • 6Pniak T, Formmek M, Matousek P, et al. Bipolar thermofusion BiClamp 150 in thyroidectomy : a review of 1156 operations [ J ]. Biomed Res Int,2014 ,2014 :707265.
  • 7Aggeli C, Zografos GN, Nixon A, et al. Postoperative hypopara- thyroidism after thyroid surgery [ J ], Hellenic Journal of Surgery, 2015, 87(1): 106-110.
  • 8Docimo G, Tolone S, Ruggiero R, et al. Total thyroidectomy with harmonic scalpel combined to gelatin-thrombin matrix hemostatic a- gent: is it safe and effective? A single-center prospective study [J]. Int J Surg,2014,12 Suppl 1 :$209-212.
  • 9魏涛,李志辉,朱精强.超声刀与传统方法在开放甲状腺手术的临床对比研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2008,15(5):323-326. 被引量:49
  • 10张二勇,黄海锋,张春军.胸乳入路腔镜下甲状腺手术54例临床分析[J].中国现代医生,2011,49(1):145-145. 被引量:10

引证文献7

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部