摘要
本文以全球现代化的实践与理论为背景 ,考察了“自发模式”与“变法模式”的不同历史轨迹与不同特征。在此基础上 ,作者梳理了近年来我国立法理论与实务的基本思路 ,指出审议中的《立法法》 (草案 )存在三方面的问题 :未能涉及立法与市场的关系 (即立法或不立法 )这一根本性问题 ;忽视立法实现资源的有效配置这一实体价值 ;在立法程序的民主性与科学性方面仍有欠缺。作者据此提出 ,我国《立法法》的出台宁肯慢些 。
The paper investigates the different historical loci and characteristics of spontaneous models and models of institutional reform against the practice and theories of global modernization. On this basis the author sums up the basic thinking of China's legislative theories and practice over recent years. Then he points out that China's “Legislative Law” (draft) under consideration has three problems: First, it does not touch the fundamental issue of relationships between legislation and the market (i.e., legislation and non legislation); second, it ignores the substantive value of the effective allocation of resources; and third, there are drawbacks in the democracy and scientificity of legislative procedure. The author holds that we would rather have a better and later legislative law than an earlier but worse one.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2000年第1期91-102,共12页
Social Sciences in China
