期刊文献+

“没A没B”格式的语义特征及语用价值 被引量:1

Semantic Features and Pragmatic Value of the Pattern of “Mei A Mei B”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "没A没B"是现代汉语口语中常用的一种固定格式。从A、B的语义聚合关系看,该格式的语义内涵分别是"既没A,也没B,也没……","既没A,又没B,而是C(C是A、B的中间项)","不分A、B","不管A、B","没有一点儿A、B"等;其语义特征可归纳为[+否定]、[+适中]、[-区分]和[-分寸]。从语用上看,该格式具有较强的主观性;该格式结构精练、内涵丰富,符合会话的经济性原则;具有较强的开放性和能产性。 “Mei A Mei B” is a regular pattern in modern spoken Chinese, which has different meanings according to the different com- binations, such as the meaning of “no A, no B and no……” , the meaning of “no A and no B, but C ( C is the middle item), the mean- ing of “no matter A or B”, or “A and B are the same” and the meaning of“no A or B at all”. The semantic features of “Mei A Mei B” pattern can be summarized as follows : [ + negative], [ + moderate], [ - distinguished] and [ - proper]. As for the pragmatic val- ue, the pattern with highly purified structure and rich connotation is very subjective, reflecting the economical rules of conversation and having the features of openness and productiveness.
作者 沈玲
出处 《长春大学学报》 2013年第1期36-40,共5页 Journal of Changchun University
关键词 没A没B 构成 语义特征 语用价值 Mei A Mei B construction semantic feature pragmatic value
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献35

共引文献2323

同被引文献22

  • 1周荐.《现代汉语词典》中的待嵌格式[J].中国语文,2001(6):550-554. 被引量:48
  • 2Barcelona, A. 2002. Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update [C] // R. Driven & R. P~rings (eds.). Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 207-277.
  • 3Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks [J]. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133-187.
  • 5Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities [M]. New York: Basic Books.
  • 6Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Construction: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [M]. Chicago and London: The U- niversity of Chicago Press.
  • 7Goldberg, A. E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 8Jones, S. et al. 2012. Antonyms in English: Construals, Constructions and Canonicity [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Justeson, J. S. & S. M. Katz. 1991. C s of antonymous adjectives and their contexts [J]. Computational Linguistics 17(17) : 1-19.
  • 10Koveeses, Z. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部