期刊文献+

基于结构洞约束的跨企业融知与融知路径选择模型 被引量:3

Selection Model of Knowledge-Syncretism for Cross-Enterprises and Knowledge-Syncretism Path in the Context of Structure Holes Constraints
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以跨企业融知网络的结构特征为背景,分析协同创新过程中的结构洞约束及由节点吸收能力和知识关联度决定的多维知识流关系。在观察创新节点知识缺口需求的基础上,着重研究了融知网络的自组织倾向与路径选择机制。然后从网络节点匹配与选择关系入手,构建了融知路径选择模型,并通过融知网络分层级重构与路径优化,实现了企业融知与创新效率的提升。最后进行了算例分析,并提出了相关对策。 This paper analyzes the constraints of structure holes, as well as the multidimensional knowledge flow relations that are determined by the knowledge absorptive capacity of nodes and the correlation between each other in the process of coordinated innovation in the context of the features of knowledge-syncretism network structures for cross-enterprises. It aims to research the tendency of self-organizational and path selection mechanism of the knowledge-syncretism network. The goal can be achieved by observing the demands of knowledge gap of innovative nodes. In order to realize the improvement of the efficiency of knowledge-syncretism and the innovation for enterprises, it is devoted to propose an optimal selective model that is related to knowledge-syncretism path and the reconfiguration of hierarchy in the perspective of the matching and selective relations of nodes on the knowledge-syncretism network. Finally, a numeric example and corresponding countermeasures are oresented.
作者 施宏伟 郭君
出处 《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期99-103,共5页 Soft Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71101114) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(JY10000906014) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助子项目研究生创新基金项目
关键词 跨企业融知 融知路径 结构洞 节点匹配 协同创新 cross-enterprises knowledge-syncretism knowledge-syncretism path structure holes matching of nodes coor-dinated innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献85

共引文献117

同被引文献90

  • 1Burt R S. Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the im- portance of local structure for managers, bankers and analysts[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007,50 (1): 119-148.
  • 2Burt R S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004, II 0(2):349-399.
  • 3Burt R S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1992 .
  • 4Granovetter M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973,78(6):1360-1380.
  • 5Coleman J S. Social capital in the creation of human capital[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1988(94): 95-12.
  • 6Reagans R, McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003(48):240-267.
  • 7Reagans R, Zuckerman E W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams[J]. Organization Science, 2001,12(4):502-517.
  • 8Soda G, Usai A, Zaheer A. Network memory: The infl uence of past and current networks on perfor- mance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004(47): 893-906.
  • 9Zaheer A, Soda G. Network evolution: The origins of structural holes[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2009(54): 1-31.
  • 10Padula G. Enhancing the innovation performance of firms by balanacing cohesiveness and briding ties[J]. Long Range Planning, 2008(41):395-419.

引证文献3

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部