期刊文献+

经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗2~4cm肾结石的临床疗效比较 被引量:5

Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscope for the manage- ment of 2 -4 em renal stones
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜治疗2~4cm肾结石的l临床效果。方法收集2009年9月至2011年1月34例输尿管软镜和36例经皮肾镜手术治疗直径范围为2—4cm肾结石,比较两者结石清除率、手术时间、住院时间及并发症。结果输尿管软镜和经皮肾镜手术一期结石清除率分别为73.5%和88.9%(P〈0.05)。经二期治疗后输尿管软镜清除率提高到88.2%。3个月后随访,清除率分别达94.1%或94.4%(P〉0.05)。输尿管软镜平均手术时间为58.2±13.4(30~85)min,经皮肾镜为38.7±11.6(14~60)min(P〈0.001)。经皮肾镜组总体并发症发生率较高,与输尿管镜组比较差异没有统计学意义。住院时间输尿管软镜组30.0±37.4h,经皮。肾镜组61.4±34.oh,P〈0.001,比较差异有统计学意义。结论多期输尿管软镜治疗2~4era的肾结石可以达到令人满意的结果,可以替代经皮肾镜治疗较大肾结石。 Objectives TO compare the outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of 2 - 4 cm kidney stones. Methods And methods between September 2009 and January 2011, 34 patients who had renal stones ranging from 2 to 4 cm in diameter were treated with flexible uretero- scope and 36 patients who had renal stones ranging from 2 to 4 cm in diameter were treated with percutaneous nephro- lithotomy. We compare the stone - free rate, operation time, hospital stay and complication after operation. Results Stone - free rates after one session were 73.5% and 88.9% for flexible ureteroscope and PCNL respectively( P 〈 0.05). Stone - free rate in the flexible ureteroscope group improved to 88.2% after the second procedure. With the following up after three months, clearance rates were up to 94.1% or 94.4% respectively( P 〉 0.05 ). Mean operation duration was 58.2 + 13.4 min in the flexible ureteroscope group but 38.7 :t: ll. 6 min in the PCNL group( P 〈0.0001 ). Overall complication rates in the PCNL group were higher, but the differences were not statistically sig- nificant. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the flexible ureteroscope group (30.0 + 37.4 vs 61.4 + 34. 0 h, respectively ; P 〈 0. 001 ). Conclusions Satisfactory outcomes can be achieved with multi - session flexible ureteroscope in the treatment of 2 ~ 4 cm renal stones. Flexible ureteroscope can be used as an alternative treatment to PCNL in selected cases with larger renal stones.
出处 《国际泌尿系统杂志》 2013年第1期34-36,共3页 International Journal of Urology and Nephrology
关键词 肾结石 输尿管镜检查 Kidney Calculi Ureteroscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1De la Rosette J , Assimos D , Desai M et al . The Clinical Re- search Offi ce of the Endourological Society percutaneous nephm- lithotomy global study:indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients . J Endourol ,2011,25:11 - 17.
  • 2Yinghao S , Yang B , Gao X . The management of renal caliceal calculi with a newly designed ureteroscope: a rigid ureteroscope with a deft ectable tip . J Endourol ,2010,24 : 23 - 26.
  • 3Hyams ES , Shah O. Percutaneousnephrostolithotomy versus flexi- ble ureteroscopy = holmium laser lithotripsy : cost and outcome a- nalysis . J Urol ,2009,182 : 1012 - 1017.
  • 4Grasso M , Conlin M , Bagley D . Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghoro calculi . J Urol ,1998,160 : 346 -351.
  • 5Breda A 00gunyemi O , Leppert JT , et al . Flexible ureterosco- py and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater - is this the new frontier? J Urol ,2008, 179 : 981 - 984.
  • 6Riley JM , Stearman L , Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for re-nal stones larger than 2, 5 cm . J Endourol ,2009,23 : 1395 - 1398.
  • 7Mariani AJ . Combined eleetrohydraulicand holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy for 20 to 40 mm renalcalcoli . J Urol ,2004,172 : 170 -174.
  • 8Kukreja R , Desai M , Patel S , et al. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study . J En- dourol ,2004,18:715 - 722.
  • 9Jung H , Norby B , Frimodt - Moller PC , et al . Endoluminal isoproterenol irrigation decreases renal pelvic pressure during fl ex- ible ureterorenoscopy: a clinical randomized, controlled study . Eur Urol ,2008,54 : 1404 -1413.
  • 10Liatsikos EN , Kapoor R , Lee B , et al . Angular percutaneous renal access. "Multiple tracts through a single incision for stag- horn calculous treatment in a single session . Eur Urol ,2005,48 : 832 - 837.

同被引文献54

  • 1何朝辉,曾国华.输尿管软镜术[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(2):142-145. 被引量:14
  • 2程跃,严泽军,谢国海,袁鹤胜,刘冠琳.“粉末化碎石”在输尿管软镜治疗肾结石中的应用[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3). 被引量:64
  • 3陶茹娓.采取多通道微创经皮肾镜取石术对120例复杂性肾结石患者进行治疗的效果[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(13):272-272. 被引量:9
  • 4Pan J, Chen Q, Xue W, et al. RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2-3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting[J]. Urolithiasis,2013,41 (1):73-78.
  • 5Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, et al. Comparison of percuta- neous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolitho- tripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis[J]. BJU Int,2012,109(9):1384-1390.
  • 6Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M,et al. A random- ized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal sur- gery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter[J]. J Endourol,2012,26(1):52-57.
  • 7Hyams ES, Shah O.Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: cost and outcome analysis[J]. J Urol,2009,182(3): 1012-7.
  • 8Fuchs A M, Fuchs G J. Retrograde intra-renal surgery for calculus disease: new minimally invasive treatment ap- proach[J].J Endourol, 1990,4:337-345.
  • 9Buscarini M, Conlin M. Update on flexible ureteroscopy[J]. Urol Int,2008,80(1):1-7.
  • 10Resorlu B, Unsal A, Ziypak T, et al.Comparison of retro-grade intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percuta- neous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radio- lucent renal stones [J] .World J Urol,2012,22:15-16.

引证文献5

二级引证文献161

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部