期刊文献+

表观弥散系数鉴别乏脂肪肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤与T1a期肾透明细胞癌的价值 被引量:5

Value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating renal angiomyolipoma absent of fat from pT1a clear cell renal cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨3.0T磁共振弥散加权成像的表观弥散系数(ADC)在乏脂肪肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤(RAML)与T1a期肾透明细胞癌(CCRCC)鉴别诊断中的价值。方法回顾性分析经病理证实的11例乏脂肪RAML及16例T1a期CCRCC患者的常规MR表现、化学位移成像及ADC值,两个不同类型肿瘤的ADC值比较采用独立样本t检验,并作ROC曲线分析。结果乏脂肪RAML的平均ADC值为(1.062±0.131)×10-3 mm2/s,明显大于T1a期CCRCC的(0.742±0.137)×10-3mm2/s(P<0.01)。ROC曲线下面积为0.949,以0.881×10-3 mm2/s为最佳鉴别阈值,其诊断乏脂肪RAML的敏感性为90.9%,特异性为87.5%。结论 ADC值有助于乏脂肪RAML与T1a期CCRCC的鉴别诊断。 Objective To evaluate the value of apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) at 3.0T MR in differentiating renal angiomyolipoma (RAML) absent of fat from pTla clear cell renal cell carcinoma(CCRCC). Methods Conventional MR images, chemical shift imaging and ADC values of 11 cases with RAML absent of fat and 16 cases of pTla CCRCC confirmed pathologically were retrospectively analyzed. The comparison of ADC values of two different types of tumors was performed with Student's t-test and the ROC curve was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of ADC values. Results The mean AIX; value of RAML absent of fat was (1. 062±0. 131) ×10^-3 mm^2/s, which was significantly higher than (0.742 ±0.137)×10^-3 mm^2/s of pTla CCRCC (P〈0. 01). The area under the ROC curve was 0. 949. Taking 0. 881 ×10^-3 mm^2/s as the best differential threshold of AIX; value, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosing RAML absent of fat were 90.9% and 87.5 %, respectively. Conclusion The ADC value is helpful in differentiating RAML absent of fat from pTla CCRCC.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第1期62-65,F0003,共5页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 磁共振成像 肾脏肿瘤 血管平滑肌脂肪瘤 Magnetic resonance imaging Renal neoplasms Angiomyolipoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献36

共引文献132

同被引文献34

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部