期刊文献+

对立违抗性障碍儿童行为和沙盘特征研究 被引量:1

Behavior and initial sandtray characters of children with oppositional defiant disorders
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨对立违抗性障碍(oppositionaldefiantdisorders,ODD)儿童行为和初始沙盘特点。方法ODD儿童24例,正常儿童24名,采用CONNERS父母问卷(PSQ)和沙盘工具,对ODD儿童和正常儿童的行为和初始沙盘特征进行比较分析。结果1.ODD儿童与正常儿童PSQ各因子得分比较,品行问题[(1.31±0.53)分、(0.36±0.31)分]、学习问题[(2.01±0.66)分、(0.57±0.51)分]、冲动-多动[(1.60±0.77)分、(0.35±0.41)分]、焦虑[(0.60±0.50)分、(0.27±0.25)分]及多动指数[(1.12±0.31)分、(0.78±0.28)分]评分均高于正常对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。2.ODD儿童与正常儿童在使用各类沙具的数量上比较,ODD儿童使用交通工具和武器明显多于正常儿童,植物及石头明显少于正常儿童,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。3.ODD儿童与正常儿童沙盘主题特征比较,ODD组较多出现混乱、忽视、受伤及威胁4个创伤主题,而较少出现整合和能量2个治愈主题,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论ODD儿童比正常儿童有更多焦虑体验。ODD儿童在初始沙盘上多呈现攻击性类沙具和创伤主题。 Objective To explore the behavior and initial sandtray characters of the children with oppositional defiant disorders (ODD) in order to provide psychological and behavioral intervention as early as possible. Methods The differences of the Conners parent symptom questionnaire (PSQ) and initial sandtrays between 24 children with ODD and 24 normal children were compared. Results PSQ indicated that children with ODD had higher scores of conduct proble ( ( 1.31 ± 0.53 ), ( 0.36 ± 0.31 ) ), learning problem ( ( 2.01± 0.66 ), ( 0.57 ± 0.5 ) ), hyperactivity-impulsion ( ( 1.60 ± 0.77 ), (0.35 ± 0.41 ) ), anxiety ( ( 0.60 ± 0.50 ), ( 0.27 ± 0.25 ) ) and hyperactivity index( ( 1.12 ± 0.31 ), ( 0.78 ± 0.28 ) ) than normal children. On the use of toys, the experimental group was significantly higher in armament and transports and lower in plants and stones(P〈 0.05 ). On the theme of sandtrays, the ODD group was significantly higher in disorder, neglect, injury, threat and lower in integration and energy(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The results show that the children with ODD have more anxiety experience than normal children and this may be associated with oppositional conduct. Children with ODD use more aggressive toys and wounded themes, revealing their attack and conflict. Psychological intervention can be provided according to the characters of behavior scale and initial sandtray.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期15-17,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(30870868,81101018)
关键词 对立违抗性障碍 行为 沙盘 Oppositional defiant disorders Behavior Sandtray
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Gale BM. Oppositional defiant disorder[A].New Yoek:Springer,2011.181-202.
  • 2孙凌,苏林雁,刘永忠.对立违抗性障碍的行为特征及相关因素[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(2):127-129. 被引量:8
  • 3Loeben R,Burke JD,Lahey BB. Oppositional defiant and conduct disorder:a review of the past 10 years part 1[J].J Am Acad Child Adoclesc Psychiatry,2000.1468-1484.
  • 4Tuvblad C,Zheng M,Raine A. A common genetic factor explains the covariation among ADHD ODD and CD Symptoms in 9-10 Year Old Boys and Girls[J].Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,2009,(2):153-167.doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9278-9.
  • 5Ybrandt H. The relation between self-concept and social functioning in adolescence[J].Journal of Adolescence,2008.1-16.
  • 6Mitchell RR,Friedman HS. Sandplay:Past,present and future[M].London:Routledge,1994.135.
  • 7Nigg JT. On Inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology:views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy[J].Psychological Bulletin,2000.220-246.
  • 8Oosterlaan J,Scheres A,Sergeant JA. Which executive functioning deficits are associated with AD/HD,ODD/CD and comorbid AD/HD +ODD/CD[J].Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,2005.69-85.
  • 9Fergusson DM,Horwood LJ,LynskeyMT. Structure of DSM-Ⅲ-R Criteria for disruptive childhood behaviors:confirmatory factor models[J].Journal of the American Academy of child and Adolescent Psychiatry,1994.1145-1155.
  • 10Ivarsson T,Gillberg C,Arvidsson T. The Youth Self-Report (YSR) and the Depression Self-Rating Scale(DSRS) as measures of depression and suicidality among adolescents[J].European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,2002.31-37.

二级参考文献28

  • 1朱焱,刘破资,苏林雁,李素洁,伍玉枝,黄斌,刘军,贺忠,黄龄,吴大兴.冲动控制任务时对立违抗性障碍儿童的功能核磁共振研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2006,14(5):439-441. 被引量:2
  • 2徐洁,张日昇.箱庭疗法应用于家庭治疗的理论背景与临床实践[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):151-154. 被引量:45
  • 3[1]Fergusson DM, Horwood J, Lynskey MT. Structure of DSM-III-R Criteria for disruptive childhood behaviors: confirmatory factor models. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,1994,33: 145-1157.
  • 4[2]Michael KM.Impact of Comorbid Oppositional or Conduct Problems on Attention-Dificit Hyperactivity Disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,1997, 36:1715-1725.
  • 5[3]Klorman R,Hazel-fernandez LA,Shaywitz SE,et al.Executive functioning deficits in Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity disorder are independent of Oppositional defiant or Reading Disorder.J Am Acd Child Adolesc Psychiatry,1999,38:1148-1155.
  • 6[9]Wiener JM.Oppositional defiant disorder.Textbook of Child Adolescent Psychiatry.Second Edition.American Psychiatric Press,Inc:American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,1996.459-463.
  • 7[10]Kazdin AE.Parent Management Training:evidence,outcome ahd issues.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry,1997,36(10):1349-1355.
  • 8Nigg JT.On Inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology:views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy.Psychol Bull,2000,126:220-246.
  • 9Oosterlaan J,Scheres A,Sergeant JA.Which executive functioning deficits are associated with AD/HD,ODD/CD and comorbid AD/HD + ODD/CD? J Abnorm Child Psychol,2005,33:69-85.
  • 10Barkley RA.Response inhibition in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.Ment Retard Dev D R,1999,5:177-184.

共引文献12

同被引文献32

  • 1孟娟.心理学扎根理论研究方法[J].吉首大学学报(社会科学版),2008,29(3):170-174. 被引量:35
  • 2陈顺森,张日昇,徐洁.团体箱庭疗法干预初中生考试焦虑的效果[J].心理与行为研究,2006,4(4):290-296. 被引量:53
  • 3刘玉华,冯正直,王莉,杨国愉,李学军.军事飞行员应对方式、状态特质焦虑与心理健康的相关性研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(4):339-341. 被引量:32
  • 4张日舁.箱庭疗法[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2006:128.
  • 5Martinussen M. Commentary on the Article by Hoermann and Goerke: Do Pilots Need Social Competence? [ J]. Int J Aviat Psychol,2014, 24(1) :32-35.
  • 6Bor R, Field G, Scragg P. The mental health of pilots:an overview [ J ]. Couns Psychol Q, 2002,15 ( 3 ) : 239-256.
  • 7Otto JL, Webber BJ. Mental health diagnoses and counseling among pilots of remotely piloted aircraft in the United States Air Force [ J ]. MSMR,2013,20(3) :3-8.
  • 8Kennedy Q, Taylor J, Noda A, et al. The STEP model : Characterizing simultaneous time effects on practice for flight simulator performance among middle-aged and older pilots [ J ]. Psychol Aging, 2015, 30 (3) :699.
  • 9Li WC, Harris D. Identifying training deficiencies in military pilots by applying the human factors analysis and classification system [ J ]. Int J Occup Saf Ergon,2013,19( 1 ) :3-18.
  • 10Johnston PJ, Catano VM. Investigating the validity of previous flying experience,both actual and simulated, in predicting initial and ad- vanced military pilot training performance [ J ]. Int J Aviat Psychol, 2013,23(3) :227-244.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部