期刊文献+

中国出口贸易中隐含二氧化碳排放量的区域差异分析——以辽宁、北京和宁夏为例 被引量:6

CASES STUDY ON LIAONING,BEIJING AND NINGXIA: REGIONAL DIFFERENCE ON CHINA'S CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSION EMBODIED IN EXPORTS
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用投入产出分析法,对2007年辽宁、北京和宁夏3个样本地区出口贸易中隐含CO2排放量进行核算,分析影响出口中隐含CO2排放量的因素,并构建结构分解分析模型来计算各因素对区域排放量差异的贡献值。结果表明,辽宁出口贸易中隐含CO2排放量最高,其次是北京,最后是宁夏。区域出口中隐含CO2排放量受出口总量、出口结构、直接CO2排放强度以及中间生产技术水平等因素的影响。辽宁出口贸易中隐含CO2排放量高于宁夏的原因是其出口总量较大,高于北京的原因在于出口部门中高耗能部门所占比重较高以及直接CO2排放强度较大。调整出口结构、提高能源效率和优化能源结构,是降低区域出口中隐含CO2排放量的主要途径。 The paper, based on cases study on Liaoning, Beijing and Ningxia, evaluates their carbon dioxide emission embodied in exports, analyzes the influencing factors and establishes structural decomposition analysis models to explore the reasons of regional difference of carbon dioxide emission embodied in exports by the input-output analysis method. It is shown that Liaoning ranks top, next by Beijing and then Ningxia. The amount of carbon dioxide emission is limited by export volume, export structure, direct carbon dioxide intensity and technical levels. The amount in Liaoning is more than that in Ningxia because of a larger export volume, and than that in Beijing because of a higher proportion of high- energy consumption and greater carbon dioxide intensity. The primary methods for reducing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere include adjusting export structure, raising energy efficiency and optimizing energy structure.
出处 《资源与产业》 2013年第1期114-119,共6页 Resources & Industries
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(40905062 71103012) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(09YJC790015)
关键词 出口贸易 隐含二氧化碳排放量 区域差异 投入产出 结构分解 export trade carbon dioxide emission embodied in exports regional differentiation input-output analysis structural decomposition analysis model
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献115

共引文献635

同被引文献115

  • 1汤二子,李影,张海英.异质性企业、出口与“生产率悖论”——基于2007年中国制造业企业层面的证据[J].南开经济研究,2011(3):79-96. 被引量:51
  • 2北京大学中国经济研究中心课题组.中国出口贸易中的垂直专门化与中美贸易[J].世界经济,2006,29(5):3-11. 被引量:327
  • 3刘遵义,陈锡康,杨翠红,Leonard K.Cheng,K.C.Fung,Yun-Wing Sung,祝坤福,裴建锁,唐志鹏.非竞争型投入占用产出模型及其应用——中美贸易顺差透视[J].中国社会科学,2007(5):91-103. 被引量:327
  • 4Brown M T, Herendeen R A. Embodied energy analysis and emergy analysis : a comparative view [ J ] . Ecological Economics, 1996 , 19 (3) : 219-235.
  • 5Shonali P, Spreng D. Direct and indirect energy requirements of households in India[J]. Energy Policy, 2002, 30(6) : 511-523.
  • 6Lenzen M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis [ J ]. Energy Policy, 1998, 26(6) : 495-506.
  • 7Liu Hongtao, Guo Jue, Qian Dong, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of household indirect energy consumption and impacts of alternative energy policies in China by input-output analysis [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2009, 37 ( 8 ) : 3194- 3204.
  • 8Chen Z M, Chen G Q, Zhou J B, et al. Ecological input-output modeling for embodied resources and emissions in Chinese economy 2005 [ J ]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2010, 15 (7) : 1942-1965.
  • 9Ang B W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [ J]. Energy Policy, 2004, 32 (9) : 1131-1139.
  • 10Dong Yanli, Ishikawa M, Liu Xianbing, et al. An analysis of the driving forces of CO2 emissions embodied in Japan-China trade [ J ]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(11): 6784-6742.

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部