摘要
依据民法学问题的讨论是否与民法规则的设计或适用直接相关,民法学问题可被区分为民法问题和纯粹民法学问题。民法学界关注和讨论的不少问题,属于与民法规则的设计或适用不直接相关的纯粹民法学问题,其主要包括事实判断问题、价值判断问题和解释选择问题。民事法律事实的类型区分属于纯粹民法学问题中的解释选择问题,我国民法学界就此存在详细区分说、简略区分说与折中说的对立。在三种学说都符合逻辑自洽且富有学说解释力标准的前提下,简略区分说更能满足民法学界对民事法律事实进行类型区分的各种主要学术目的,因而是更为可取的学说。
Based on whether the discussion of civil law theory issues is directly related to the design and application of the rules of civil law, civil law theory issues can be divided into civil law issues and pure civil law theory issues. Many issues being focused on and discussed by civil law scholars are pure civil law theory issues, which primarily incorporate the judgment about facts, the judgment about values and the choice of in- terpretations. The classification of civil legal facts is an issue of the choice of interpretations, and Chinese civil law scholars hold three different theories, which are the detailed distingnishment theory, the brief distinguish- ment theory and the compromise theory. If all these theories are intrinsically logical and according with aca- demic explanatory standard, the brief distingui law scholars to classify the civil legal facts. In shment theory can better satisfy the academic purposes of civil conclusion, the brief distinguishment theory is more advisable.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期71-79,共9页
China Legal Science
基金
霍英东青年教师基金
教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划"民法学方法论"阶段性成果之一
