期刊文献+

乳腺导管原位癌患者生活质量调查及相关因素分析 被引量:2

Survey of quality of life for patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ and analysis of related factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的调查乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)患者生活质量(QOL),分析其相关影响因素。方法采用36条目简明量表(sF-36),对术后1年的84例DCIS患者、125例浸润性乳腺癌患者进行QOL评估,分析年龄、手术方式、内分泌治疗、学历、婚姻状况、工作状态、医疗保险对患者QOL的影响。结果与正常女性相比,术后1年的DCIS患者在生理功能(t=2.468,P=0.029)、躯体疼痛(t=2.076,P=0.039)、总体健康(t=2.153,P=0.033)和精神健康(t=3.396,P=0.003)4个维度得分较低,而浸润性乳腺癌患者在生理功能(t=5.638。P=0.002)、躯体疼痛(t=5.417,P=0.002)、活力(t:4.438,P=0.002)、总体健康(t=3.960,P=0.002)和精神健康(£=6.020,P:0.001)5个维度得分低于正常。两组患者QOL大致相似,有6个维度得分差异无统计学意义,但在生理功能(t:2.714,P=0.032)和活力(t=2.134,P=0.040)方面DCIS患者优于浸润性癌患者。术后内分泌治疗是影响DCIS患者QOL的重要因素,显著降低了患者生理功能(t:2.082)、躯体疼痛(t=2.003)、总体健康(t=2.751)、活力(t=2.048)和精神健康(t=4.162)5个维度得分,P均小于0.05。结论术后1年DCIS患者QOL较差,内分泌治疗是重要影响因素。 Objective To study the quality of life (QOL) of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to analyze the relevant factors affecting their QOL. Methods A total of 84 patients with DCIS and 125 patients with invasive breast cancer were surveyed. Researchers used SF-36 to assess the QOL of participants at one year after operation. The relationships between some information of patients and SF-36 score were analyzed, such as age, the type of surgery, endocrine therapy, education, marital status, working status and health insurance. Results Compared to normal women, patients with DCIS had lower QOL in physical function (t = 2. 468, P = 0. 029), bodily pain (t = 2. 076, P = 0. 039), general health (t = 2. 153, P = 0. 033) and mental heahh ( t = 3. 396, P = 0. 003). Patients with invasive breast cancer also had poorer QOL in physical function ( t = 5. 638, P = 0. 002 ), bodily pain ( t = 5. 417, P = 0. 002 ), vitality ( t = 4.438, P= 0.002) , general health (t =3.960, P =0.002) and mental health (t =6.020, P =0.001). QOL of DCIS patients was similar to that of invasivc breast cancer patients, except that scores of physical function ( t = 2.714, P = 0.032 ) anti vitality ( t = 2.134, P = 0. 040) were better in DCIS patients. Endocrine therapy significantly affected the score of QOL of DCIS patients. DCIS patients with endocrine therapy had poorer score in physical function ( t = 2. 082, P 〈 0.05 ) , bodily pain ( t = 2. 003, P 〈 0.05), general health (t = 2. 751, P 〈 0.05), vitality (t =2.048, P〈0.05) and mental health (t =4. 162, P〈0.05). Conclusion Patients with DC1S hav poor QOI, at one year after operation. Endocrine therapy significantly reduces their QOL.
出处 《国际肿瘤学杂志》 CAS 2013年第2期153-156,共4页 Journal of International Oncology
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 导管内 非浸润性 生活质量 36条目简明量表 Breasl neoplasms Carcinoma, intraductal, noninfihrating Quality of life SF-36
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1潘廷芳,司超增,何慧婧,王斌,单广良.我国6省市人群的健康相关生命质量研究[J].基础医学与临床,2011,31(6):636-641. 被引量:86
  • 2Jeffe DB,Pérez M,Liu Y. Quality of life over time in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ,early-stage invasive breast cancer,and age-matched controls[J].Breast Cancer Research and Treatment,2012,(01):379-391.
  • 3Rakovitch E,Franssen E,Kim J. A comparison of risk perception and psychological morbidity in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early invasive breast cancer[J].Breast Cancer Research and Treatment,2003,(03):285-293.
  • 4Kennedy F,Harcourt D,Rumsey N. The psychosocial impact of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS):a longitudinal prospective study[J].Breast,2010,(05):382-387.
  • 5Berger AM,Gerber LH,Mayer DK. Cancer-related fatigue:implications for breast cancer survivors[J].Cancer,2012,(8 Suppl):2261-2269.
  • 6Colleoni M,Giobbie-Hurder A. Benefits and adverse effects of endocrine therapy[J].Annals of Oncology,2010,(Suppl 7):vii107-vii111.
  • 7Pockaj BA,Degnim AC,Boughey JC. Quality of life after breast cancer surgery:What have we learned and where should we go next[J].Journal of Surgical Oncology,2009,(07):447-455.

二级参考文献11

  • 1关维俊,庞淑兰,薛玲,林本成.唐山市老年公寓老年人生命质量的影响因素[J].中国行为医学科学,2006,15(7):653-655. 被引量:8
  • 22010中国卫生统计年鉴.
  • 3Lain CLK, Lauder IJ, tam TP, et al. Population based norruing of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 health survey [ J ]. HK Pract, 1999,21:460 - 470.
  • 4Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide [ M ]. Boston:New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, 1993.
  • 5Asronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PDA, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the dutch language version of the SF-36 health survey in community and chronic disease populations[ J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51 : 1055 - 1068.
  • 6Persson L, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C. et al. The swedish SF- 36 health survey Ⅱ , evaluation of clinical validity: results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51 : 1095 - 1103.
  • 7Nelson EC, Landgraf JM, Hays RD, et al. The functional status of patients: How can it be measured in physicians' offices? [J]. Med Care, 1990,28 : 1111 - 1126.
  • 8Power F, Matthews S, Manor O. Inequalities in self-rated health explanation from different stages of life [ J ]. Lancet, 1998,351 : 1009 - 1014.
  • 9朱燕波,王琦,陈柯帆,骆晓霞,唐芳.一般人群健康相关生命质量的预测因素[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2009,18(3):254-259. 被引量:96
  • 10刘朝杰,李宁秀,任晓晖,李俊,张骏,孙丁.36条目简明量表在中国人群中的适用性研究[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,32(1):39-42. 被引量:311

共引文献85

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部