期刊文献+

反刍思维反应量表在中国职业女性群体的初步运用 被引量:13

Preliminary Application of the Rumination Response Scale(RRS) to Chinese Working Women
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:检验反刍思维反应量表(RRS)在中国职业女性群体中的信、效度。方法:首先用中文版反刍思维反应量表测量了250名职业女性(样本1);接着又用中文版反刍思维反应量表、自评抑郁量表、特质焦虑量表、生活满意度量表对427名职业女性(样本2)进行了测量,两周后对样本2中的245名被试进行了重测。结果:①中文版RRS的所有项目的决断值在3.059~12.135之间.均达到0.Ol及其以上水平显著。项目与量表总分的相关在0.411-0.628之间,均具有统计学意义(P〈0.01);②探索性因子分析显示,RRS由三因子构成。验证性因子分析显示三因子模型拟合指数为χ2/df=-2.50,RMSEA=0.061,Nn=0.93,NNFI=0.95,CFI=0.96,GFI=O.90;③RRS总分及三个因子的Cronbachd系数在0.741~0.879之间、两周后的重测信度在0.768~0.823之间;@RRS总分及三个因子均与生活满意度呈显著负相关,与抑郁、焦虑呈显著正相关。结论:RRS在中国职业女性群体具有良好的信、效度。 Objective: To investigate the reliability and validity of the RRS in Chinese working women. Methods: A sample of 250 working women (Sample One) participated in the study by completing the Chinese version of Rumination Response Scale; and then a sample of 427 working women (Sample Two) was chosen as subjects to complete the Chinese version of Rumination Response Scale, Self-Rating Depression Scale, Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Life Satisfaction Scale. 245 of Sample Two were re-tested after two weeks. Results: ①The critical ratios of all items in the Chinese version of Rumination Response Scale ranged from 3.059 to 12.135, and were significant at 0.01 level and above. The correlation coefficients between each item and the total score of the scale ranged from 0.411 to 0.628, and all were statistically signifi- cant(P〈0.01). ②Exploratory factor analysis showed that the RRS consisted of three factors. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the fit indices for the three-factor model were χ2/df=2.50, RMSEA=0.061, NFI=0.93, NNFI=0.95, CFI=0.96, GFI=0.90. Cronbach α coefficient of the three factors and the RRS total score were from 0.741 to 0.879. And the testretest reliabilities after two weeks were between 0.768 to 0.823. ④The total score of the RRS and the three factors were all significantly negatively correlated with life satisfaction, but positively related to depression and anxiety significantly. Conclusion: The RRS has good reliability and validity in Chinese working women.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期42-44,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 2010年国家社会科学基金项目(10CSH014) 广东省突发事件心理援助应急技术研究中心资助
关键词 反刍思维反应量表 中国职业女性 信度 效度 Rumination response scale Chinese working women Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Nolen-Hoeksema S. Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1991, 100(4): 569-582.
  • 2Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61(1): 115-121.
  • 3Roberts JE, Gilboa E, Gotlib IH. Ruminative response style and vulnerability to episodes of dysphoria: Gender, enuroticism, and episode duration. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1998, 22(4): 401-423.
  • 4Lam D, Smith N, Checkley S, et al. Effect of neuroticism, response style and information processing on depression severity in a clinically depressed sample. Psychological Medicine: A Journal of Research in Psychiatry and the Allied Sciences, 2003, 33(3): 469-479.
  • 5Cox B J, Enns MW, Taylor S. The effect of rumination as a mediator of elevated anxiety sensitivity in major depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2001, 25(5): 525-534.
  • 6Treynor W, Gonzalez R, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2003, 27(3): 247-259.
  • 7杨娟,凌宇,肖晶,姚树桥.沉思反应量表中文版在高中生中初步运用结果分析[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(1):27-28. 被引量:45
  • 8韩秀,杨宏飞.Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(5):550-551. 被引量:234
  • 9汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:106-108,216-217.
  • 10陈思佚,崔红,周仁来,贾艳艳.正念注意觉知量表(MAAS)的修订及信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2012,20(2):148-151. 被引量:273

二级参考文献63

  • 1Nolen-Hoeksema S. Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and Theory. Psychological bulletin, 1987, 101(2): 259-282
  • 2Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: The 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991, 61(1): 115-121
  • 3Treynor W. Rumination Reconsidered: A Psychometric Analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2003, 27:247- 259
  • 4Broderick PC, Korteland C. A Prospective Study of Rumination and Depression in Early Adolescence. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2004, 9(3):385-394
  • 5Burwell RA, Shirk SR. Subtypes of Rumination in Adolescence: Associations Between Brooding, Reflection, Depressive Symptoms, and Coping. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 2007, 36(1):56-65
  • 6Cola SL Lo, Samuel MY Ho, Steven DH. The effects of rumination and negative cognitive styles on depression: A mediation analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 2008, 46 (4) : 487-495
  • 7Roberts JE, Gilboa E, Gotlib IH. Ruminative response style and vulnerability to episodes of dysphoria: Gender, Neuroticism, and episode duration. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1998, 22:401-423
  • 8Abela JR, Vanderbilt E, Rochon A. A test of the integration of the response styles and social support theories of depression in third and seventh grade children. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2004, 23(5):653-674
  • 9Broderick PC, Korteland C. A Prospective Study of Rumination and Depression in Early Adolescence. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2004, 9(3):383-394
  • 10Jose PE, Brown I. When does the Gender Difference in Rumination Begin? Gender and Age Differences in the Use of Rumination by Adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2008, 37(2): 180-192

共引文献555

同被引文献197

引证文献13

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部