摘要
在反垄断法执法中引入承诺制度固然能显著提高执法效率,但承诺制度的替代性、灵活性特征决定其在一定程度上是以牺牲反垄断法的其他价值为代价来获得执法效率提升的。为此,对承诺制度的适用予以法律控制成为必需。相比实体控制的不易操作、难以固定化,各国立法与实践普遍采用程序方式来控制承诺制适用可能带来的风险。以承诺制度的适用阶段为标准,程序控制的内容基本可分为"先决程序"、"操作程序"与"后续程序"三个方面,这些内容在反垄断执法经验相对丰富的国家或地区大同小异。我国《反垄断法》也规定了"经营者承诺制度",但各类程序性控制机制基本没有建立起来。《反垄断法》实施逐渐深入的背景下,这是一个需要解决的现实问题。
The application of commitment system can significantly improve the efficiency of anti-monopoly law enforcement,but its characteristics flexibility of demonstrates that efficiency improvements are gained to a certain extent at the expense of other values.Therefore,the application of commitment system must be under the control of law.Because the related substantive systems are difficult to define,indispensable procedures are especially emphasized in most countries' legislation and practice to control the possible risks of the application of commitment system.These procedures are much the same in those countries or regions which have extensive anti-monopoly law enforcement experiences and can be divided into three types: 'preconditions procedures','operating procedures' and 'follow-up procedures'.Commitment system is also stipulated in China's Anti-Monopoly Law,the corresponding procedural systems are however quite lacking.With the continuous and increasing development of Anti-Monopoly Law enforcement,this is a real problem to be solved urgently.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期81-97,178,共17页
The Jurist
基金
国家社科基金青年项目"反垄断法实施中的承诺制度执行难题研究"(项目编号:10CFX074)
安徽大学经济法制研究中心2011年特别项目"我国反垄断法实施程序完善研究"的阶段性成果
关键词
反垄断法
承诺制度
适用风险
程序控制
Commitment System in Anti-Monopoly Law
Risks of Application
Indispensable Procedures
