期刊文献+

制造商规模不经济的链与链竞争两部定价合同 被引量:42

Two-part tariffs of chain-to-chain competition under manufacturer's scale diseconomies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于链与链数量竞争及制造商生产规模不经济的环境,以批发价格合同为基准,探索两部定价合同选择的绩效改进条件、博弈均衡特征和局限性,并进一步分析市场竞争强度、规模不经济参数对合同选择行为的影响.研究发现:不管竞争对手供应链是否采用两部定价合同,本供应链通过采用两部定价合同并把固定收费调节在适当范围内,可使制造商和零售商同时实现帕累托(Pareto)绩效改进.值得指出的是,通过适当调节固定收费,两部定价合同成为实现制造商和零售商帕累托绩效改进的占优均衡合同,但该固定收费的选择严重依赖于竞争强度和规模不经济的程度.当规模不经济程度相对较强且严重依赖于数量竞争强度时,两部定价合同是实现供应链系统绩效改进的占优均衡合同. Based on chain-to-chain quantity competition and the manufacturers' scale diseconomies, this pa- per not only explored the requirements of the performance improvement of supply chain' s members, the char- acters of the equilibrium, and the limitations of the two-part tariffs when the manufacturer chooses the two-part tariffs other than wholesale price contract, but also analyzed the impact of intensity of quantity competition and scale diseconomies on the behaviors of manufacturer' s choices. The results show that: two-part tariffs can re- alize the win-win of both the manufacturer' s and retailer' s performances by adjusting the fixed fee regardless of the rival supply chain' s contract choice; the equilibrium can be a dominant equilibrium by adjusting the fixed fee, but the fixed fee is strongly influenced by the intensity of scale diseconomies and quantity competi- tion ; two-part tariffs produces a dominant equilibrium for the supply chain' s performance when the intensity of scale diseconomies is relatively stronger and influenced by the intensity of quantity competition.
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期60-70,共11页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70932005) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70772070)
关键词 链与链 数量竞争 规模不经济 两部定价合同 chain-to-chain quantity competition diseconomies of scale two-part tariffs
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Banker R D,Kemerer C F. Scale economies in new software development[J].IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,1989,(10):1199-1205.doi:10.1109/TSE.1989.559768.
  • 2Zenger T R. Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D:Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent,ideas,and effort by firm size[J].Management Science,1994,(06):708-729.
  • 3Dixon H D. Inefficient diversification in multi-market oligopoly with diseconomies of scope[J].Economic Journal,1994,(242):213-219.
  • 4Alvarez A,Arias C. Diseconomies of size with fixed managerial ability[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2003,(01):134-142.
  • 5Spengler J J. Vetical integration and antitrust policy[J].Journal of Political Economy,1954,(04):347-352.
  • 6Cachon G P. Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts[A].Amsterdam:Elsevier Science,2003.
  • 7Cachon G P,de Kok A G. Competing manufacturers in a retail supply chain:On contractual form and coordination[J].Management Science,2010,(03):571-589.doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1122.
  • 8McGuire W,Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration[J].Marketing Science,1983,(02):161-191.
  • 9Coughlan A T. Competition and cooperation in marketing channel choice:Theory and application[J].Marketing Science,1985,(02):110-129.
  • 10Moorthy K S. Strategic decentralization in channels[J].Marketing Science,1988,(04):335-355.

二级参考文献106

共引文献199

同被引文献311

引证文献42

二级引证文献396

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部