期刊文献+

玉米作物水分胁迫指数(CWSI)基线差异原因初探 被引量:3

Preliminary Investigation on Difference of Crop Water Stress Index Baseline for Maize
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了探讨相同作物水分胁迫指数(CWSI)基线,在不同试验条件下存在差异的原因,于2010年及2011年连续2年在南方红壤区进行了不同施肥处理的玉米小区试验。结果表明,不同的氮素处理,玉米形态学指标及叶龄存在差异,其中不施氮的处理与施氮的处理差异显著(P<0.05),施氮多和施氮少的处理差异较小。在玉米不同的生育期,CWSI下基线不完全相同。施肥能够影响玉米冠气温差的降低程度,施用氮肥越多,冠气温差降幅越大,从而可使不同施肥处理的CWSI下基线产生差异。此外,在作物发生干旱时,施用不同类型的肥料还能够影响作物冠气温差的增加程度,其中施用化肥处理玉米冠气温差要比施用有机肥和不施肥的处理高,施用有机肥处理的玉米冠气温差也较不施肥的处理高。研究结果认为,相同作物CWSI基线的差异与作物本身品种,以及不同生长条件下作物生长状况之间的差异密切相关,而气候条件是造成这种差异的辅助因素。 Crop water stress index(CWSI) is an useful tool to quickly assess water status of crop.For usage of CWSI with same baselines for specific crop in different areas under different climate types,we investigated the reason of difference for crop water stress index baseline of summer maize at different treatments.The summer maize field experiments were carried out in red soil areas of south China under different fertilizer treatments during two consecutive years.The results showed that,the morphological indices and leaf age of maize under different nitrogenous fertilizer treatments were different.The low baselines of maize at different growing stage were not same.Fertilization had an effect on low baseline of maize.Nitrogen fertilization reduced the low baselines of maize.The low baseline decreased as the amount of nitrogen fertilization increased.Fertilization also had an effect on upper baseline of maize under severe water stress conditions.The results indicated that,the main reason of difference of CWSI baselines for same crop was the growing conditions and growing stage of crop.The weather condition was the second factor to impact baseline of CWSI.
出处 《中国农学通报》 CSCD 2013年第6期46-53,共8页 Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"坡耕地水蚀对红壤季节性干旱的影响"(40871139) 国家自然科学基金项目"红壤穿透阻力对季节性干旱的影响机制及调控意义"(41271240) 甘肃省气象局气象科研项目"基于作物系数法的春小麦干旱指标体系建立"(2012-15)
关键词 作物水分胁迫指数 冠层温度 基线 玉米 crop water stress index canopy temperature baseline maize
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1李韵珠,陆锦文,吕梅,史美胡,牛德贵,赵秀英.作物干旱指数(CWSI)和土壤干旱指数(SWSI)[J].土壤学报,1995,32(2):202-209. 被引量:21
  • 2王宝英,张学.农作物高产的适宜土壤水分指标研究[J].灌溉排水,1996,15(3):35-39. 被引量:30
  • 3康绍忠,蔡焕杰,张富仓,刘晓明,梁银丽,梁银丽.节水农业中作物水分管理基本理论问题的探讨[J].水利学报,1996,28(5):9-17. 被引量:27
  • 4陈玉民,孙景生,肖俊夫.节水灌溉的土壤水分控制标准问题研究[J].灌溉排水,1997,16(1):24-28. 被引量:46
  • 5Stockle CO, Dugas WA. Evaluating canopy temperature-based indices for irrigation scheduling [J]. Irrig Sci, 1992,13:31-37.
  • 6Jensen ME. Water consumption by agricultural plants [A]. In: Water Deficits in Plant Growth[C]. New York: Academic Press, 1968:1-22.
  • 7Rao NH, Sarma PBS,Chander S. Irrigation scheduling under limited water supply [J]. Agri Water Manage, 1988,15:165-175.
  • 8Driessen PM, Konijn NT.宇振荣,等译.土地利用分析[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1997.
  • 9Ritchie JT. Soil water balance and plant water stress [A]. In: Understanding Options for Agricultural production-Systematic Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development[C]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
  • 10安顺清,焦仪珍.气象旱度模式和干旱特征分析[A].作物水分胁迫和干旱研究[C].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1991:173-214.

共引文献78

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部