摘要
斯坦福大学诉罗氏公司侵犯专利权案是围绕存在第三方合作的政府资助发明的权利归属问题展开的讨论。本案的发生引发对《拜杜法案》和《专利法》中发明人转让专利的优先性问题的思考。虽然我国的职务发明制度与美国不同,但是本案的发生对我国解决存在第三方合作的政府资助发明的权利归属问题提供了借鉴。
The patent infringement case of Stanford v.Roche is a trial on the right adscription of government-funded invention with co-operation of a third party.This case led a hot issue on the priority of patent assignment in ＂Bayh-Dole Act＂ and ＂Patent Law＂.Although the system of service invention in China is different from that in the United States,this case provides a reference and guideline on solving the problem of the right adscription of government-funded invention with co-operation of a third party in China.
出处
《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》
2013年第1期30-32,共3页
Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词
权利归属
优先性
职务发明
right adscription
priority
service invention
