摘要
目的制定评价科技实力指标权重。方法采用主观赋权(专家打分法、对比排序法、Saaty's权重法)和客观赋权(标准离差法、熵权法、CRITIC法)相结合的方法制定科技实力指标权重。结果主观赋权法得到的指标权重之间相关系数均大于0.7,客观赋权方法中,熵权法和标准离差法及CRITIC法得到的权重之间存在负相关;主观赋权方法中排序法和Satty's权重法均与熵权法得到的权重存在正相关。权重较大的指标为科学著作总数、装备定型总数、军用标准总数、SCI/EI/ISTP数、第一等级科技获奖数等。结论多种赋权方法联合应用制定评价指标权重较单一方法赋权更具有合理性。
Objective To explore approaches in identifying weights of technology strength assessment indicator. Methods To combine subjective methods （expert evaluation method, contrast rank method, Saaty＇s weight method） with objectives methods（ standard deviation method, entropy method, CRITIC method） for the weights of technology strength assessment indicator. Results The correlation coefficient were greater than 0. 7 among the subjective methods. There is negative correlation between entropy method and standard deviation method, while there is positive correlation between expert evaluation method, Saaty＇s weight method and entropy method. The most important indicators are the number of scientific paper, the number of designed equipment, the number of military standard,the number of SCI/EI/ISTP,the number of the first level prize in science and technology. Conclusion Application of multiple methods could be used to evaluate weights of indicator for comprehensive assessment.
出处
《中国卫生统计》
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第1期27-30,共4页
Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
基金
军队指令课题(BS310L002)
关键词
权重
综合评价
科技实力
Weights
Comprehensive assessment
Technology strength
