期刊文献+

InterTAN髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折疗效比较 被引量:3

Comparison of InterTAN and dynamic hip screw in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较InterTAN髓内钉(1T)与动力髋螺钉(DHS)治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效。方法选择行手术治疗的股骨转子间骨折患者56例,根据手术方式不同分为rr组21例和DHS组35例,比较两组术中情况(手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、住院时间)、术后并发症(伤口感染、下肢深静脉血栓、褥疮、尿路感染、肺炎)和骨折愈合情况(骨折愈合时间、股骨颈短缩、髋内翻及髋关节Harris评分)。结果IT组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度和住院时间均明显优于DHS组l(62.16±15.26)min比(85.78±19.50)min、(237.73±108.51)ml比(490.87±127.90)ml、(10.20±2.02)cm比(19.83±2.98)cm和(10.2±5.52)d比(15.58±5.32)d,P〈0.01],两组术后并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。IT组股骨颈短缩和髋内翻发生率明显少于DHS组[9.52%(2/21)比28.57%(10/35)和14.29%(3/21)比31.43%(11/35),P〈0.01],在骨折愈合时间及髋关节Harris评分方面两组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论与DHS相比,IT的应用范围更广,手术时间明显缩短,且固定可靠,更适用于治疗股骨转子间骨折。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of InterTAN (IT) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Methods From July 2008 to November 2011, the patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures were treated by IT (IT group,2l patients) and DHS (DHS group,35 patients). The intraoperative data (operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length and hospitalization period), postoperative complications (wound infection, lower limb deep venous thrombosis, bedsore, urinary tract infection and pneumonia) and fracture healing (fracture healing time, femoral neck crispation, coxa vara and Harris scores) were compared. Results IT group was superior to DHS group in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length and hospitalization period [ (62.16 ± 15.26 ) rain vs. (85.78 ± 19.50) min, (237.73 ± 108.51) ml vs. (490.87 ± 127.90) ml, (10.20 ±2.02) cm vs.(19.83 ± 2.98) cm and (10.23±5.52) d vs. (15.58 ±5.32) d,P〈0.01]. However, there was no significant difference in postoperative complications (P 〉 0.05). There was significant difference between IT group and DHS group in femoral neck crispation, coxa vara [9.52% (2/21)vs. 28.57% (10/35), 14.29% (3/21)vs. 31.43% (11/35 ),P 〈 0.01 ]. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time and Harris scores (P 〉 0.05). Conclusions Compared with DHS, IT has extensive application, shorter surgical time and reliable fixation effect. Therefore, IT is suitable to femoral intertrochanteric fractures.
出处 《中国医师进修杂志》 2013年第5期4-7,共4页 Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
关键词 髋骨折 InterTAN髓内钉 动力髋螺钉 Hip fractures InterTAN intramedullary nail Dynamic hip screw
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献112

共引文献270

同被引文献32

  • 1RUPPRECHT M, GROSSTERLINDEN L, RUECKER A H, et al. A comparative biomechanical analysis of fixation devices for unstable femoral neck fractures: the Intertan versus cannulated screws or a dynamic hip screw E J~. J Trauma, 2011, 71(3)~ 625-634.
  • 2JENSEN J S, MICHAELSEN M. Trochanteric femoral fractures treated with McLaughlin osteosynthesis[J]. Acta Orthop Seand, 1975, 46(5)~ 795-803.
  • 3KAUFER H. Mechanics of the treatment of hip injuries[-J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1980, (146): 53-61.
  • 4ANGLEN J O, WEINSTEIN J N. Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures~ changing pattern of practice. A review of the American board of orthopaedic surgery database[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90(4) : 700-707.
  • 5PARKER M J, HANDOLL H H. Gamma and other eephaloeondylie intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults EJ/OL].Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2010, (9)~ CD000093E2010- 09-08 1. http://onlinelibrary, wiley, com/doi/10. 1002/ 14651858. CD000093. pub5/full.
  • 6SAUDAN M, LUBBEKE A, SADOWSKI C, et al. Pertrochanter[c ~ractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?. A randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2002, 16(6): 386-393.
  • 7RUECKER A H, RUPPRECHT M, GRUBER M, et al. The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: results using an intramedullary nail with integrated cephaloeervieal screws and linear compression[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2009, 23(1) 22-30.
  • 8BELLABARBA C, HERSCOVICI D Jr, RICCI W M. Percutaneous treatment of peritrochanteric fractures using the Gamma nail[J~. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000, (375): 30-42.
  • 9LEUNG K S, CHEN C M, SO W S, et al. Multicenter trial of modified Gamma nail in East Asia[-J']. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996, 323: 146-154.
  • 10HUANG Y, ZHANG C, LUO Y. A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures[J]. Int Orthop, 2013, 37(12): 2465-2473.

引证文献3

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部