期刊文献+

潜在锚定效应的加工机制初探 被引量:1

A Study on the Processing Mechanisms of Subliminal Anchoring Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 潜在锚定效应指的是阈限下的启动锚定数字导致的锚定效应现象。本研究探讨了潜在锚定效应的产生机制。采用2(潜在锚类型:高锚vs低锚)×2(词汇类型:夏天vs冬天)混合设计。结果发现,在潜在高锚情况下,夏天词汇的反应时(M=745.50)显著快于冬天词汇的反应时;在潜在低锚情况下,冬天词汇的反应时(M=697.47)显著快于夏天词汇的反应时。即被试对与启动锚定数字信息一致的词汇判断的反应时比不一致的更快。研究结果表明,潜在锚定效应的产生是由于锚定数字内部命题属性被激活导致的。 Subliminal anchoring effects refer to a phenomenon that the anchoring effects still occur even if the anchor val- ues are presented subliminally. To explore the mecha- nisms of the subliminal anchoring effects, the current research conducted a 2 (Anchor Types: High vs Low) × 2 (Word Types:Summer vs Winter) mixed factorial design. A significant interaction effect was found be- tween Anchor and Word. Participants who had been subliminally presented with the high anchor were in- deed relatively faster in responding to words that are as- sociated with summer than to words associated with winter. anchor Participants who had been exposed to the low values, however, were relatively faster in re- spending to words associated with winter rather than summer. The results showed that participants were faster in recognizing anchor-consistent rather than an- chor-inconsistent target words in the lexical decision task, suggesting that the accessibility of the proposition property in numerical anchors may be the mechanisms of subliminal anchoring effects.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2012年第3期249-255,262,共8页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
关键词 锚定效应 潜在锚 外在锚 自发锚 anchoring effects, subliminal anchor, experimenter provided anchor, self-generated anchor
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

二级参考文献247

  • 1Adair, L. W., & Weingart, L. (2007). The timing and function of offers in U.S. and Japanese Negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1056 - 1068.
  • 2Ash, K. I., & Jennifer, W. (2008). Hindsight bias in insight and mathematical problem-solving: evidence of different reconstruction mechanisms for metacognitive vs. situational judgments. Memory & Cognition, 36, 822 - 837.
  • 3Brewer, N. T., & Chapman, G.. B. (2002). The fragile basic anchoring effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 65 - 77.
  • 4Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G.. B., Schwartz, J.A., & Bergus, G.. R. (2007). The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients. Medical Decision Making, 27, 203 -211.
  • 5Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In: T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman, Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment.(pp. 120 - 138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391-396.
  • 7Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Are adjustments insufficient? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 447-460.
  • 8Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 199 - 212.
  • 9Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006).The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychology Science, 17, 311 - 318.
  • 10Epley, N., & I(eysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327 - 339.

共引文献284

同被引文献25

  • 1Ariely,D,Loewenstein,G,Prelec,D. "Coherent arbitrariness"Stable demand curves without stable preferences[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2003,(01):73-105.
  • 2Blankenship,K.L,Wegener,D.T,Petty,R.E,Dieweiler-Bedell,B & Macy,C.L. Elaboration and consequences of anchored estimates:An attitudinal perspective on numerical anchoring[J].{H}Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2008,(06):1465-1476.
  • 3Epley,N,Gilovich,T. When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring:Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors[J].{H}JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING,2005,(03):199-212.
  • 4Epley,N,Gilovich,T. The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic,Why the adjustments are insufficient[J].{H}Psychological Science,2006,(04):311-318.
  • 5Epley,N,Gilovich,T. Anchoring unbound[J].{H}JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY,2010,(01):20-24.
  • 6Frederick,S,Kahneman,D,Mochon,D. Elaborating a Simpler theory of anchoring[J].{H}JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY,2010,(01):17-19.
  • 7Furnham,A,Boo,H.C. A literature review of the anchoring effect[J].Journal of Socio-Economics,2011,(01):35-42.
  • 8Jacowitz,K.E,Kahneman,D. Measures of anchoring in estimation tasks[J].{H}PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN,1995,(11):1161-1166.
  • 9Kruger,J. Lake Wobegon be gone! The"below-average effect"and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments[J].{H}Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1999,(02):221-232.
  • 10Mussweiler,T. The durability of anchoring effects[J].{H}EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY,2001,(04):431-442.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部