ERP实施对企业绩效影响的实证研究——基于倾向得分匹配法被引量：12

Impact of ERP on firm performance evaluated using the propensity score matching method

导出

摘要该文试图研究中国企业实施企业资源规划(ERP)系统之后其绩效的变化情况。为了获得相应的实证结果,该研究收集了1998—2007年实施ERP系统的129个企业样本,采用基于倾向得分匹配法研究了样本企业实施ERP后的绩效变化。研究结果表明:ERP实施后第1年和第2年运营绩效有所改善,而盈利能力则在第4年有显著提高。该结果表明:ERP实施可迅速提高企业的运营绩效,而对于盈利能力的改善则存在一定的时滞效应,需要较长的时间才能显现。 This study analyzes Chinese firm performance after implementing enterprise resource planning （ERP） systems. The study collect data from 129 firms which implemented ERP systems during 1998--2007, and study the firm performance change with propensity score matching method. The results show firms＇ operational performance improves during the two years after ERP implementation, whereas the profitability does not improve until four years later. The empirical results show that ERP implementation quickly improves operational performance, but has a time lagged effect and requires a longer time to show improved profitability.

作者张露黄京华黎波

机构地区清华大学经济管理学院

出处《清华大学学报（自然科学版）》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期117-121,共5页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70831003)

关键词企业资源规划(ERP)系统企业绩效运营绩效盈利能力时滞效应倾向得分匹配法 enterprise resource planning （ERP） systems firm performance operational performance profitability lag effects propensity score matching method

分类号 F406.73 [经济管理—产业经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献14

1Kohli R, Grover V. Business value of IT, An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2008, 9(2): 23-39.
2Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L. Information technology as a factor of production: The role of differences among firms [J]. Economics of Innovatfon and New Technology, 1995, 3(4) : 183 - 200.
3Ramirez R, Melville N, Lawler E. Information technology infrastructure, organizational process redesign, and business value: An empirical analysis [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2010, 49(4): 417-429.
4Ravichandran T, Liu Y, Han S, et al, Diversification and firm performance: Exploring the moderating effects of information technology spending [J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2009, 25(4) : 204 - 240.
5Davenport T H. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1998, 76(4): 121 - 132.
6McAfee A. The impact of enterprise information technology adoption on operational performance : An empirical investigation [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2002, 11(1): 33-53.
7王立彦,张继东.ERP系统实施与公司业绩增长之关系——基于中国上市公司数据的实证分析[J].管理世界,2007,23(3):116-121. 被引量：94
8郑称德,宋由由,郭印,陈金勇,王燕.我国企业ERP系统实施绩效的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(4):148-151. 被引量：25
9赵泉午,黄志忠,卜祥智.上市公司ERP实施前后绩效变化的实证研究--来自沪市1993--2003年的经验数据[J].管理科学学报,2008,11(1):122-132. 被引量：44
10Hitt L M, Wu D J, Zhou X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures [J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2002, 19(1) : 71 - 98.

二级参考文献72

1陈升 ,李传昭 ,张旭梅 ,李书华 .中小企业IT应用及其绩效的实证分析[J].管理工程学报,2005,19(3):82-88. 被引量：5
2王云峰,李杰,丁明磊.从ERP成功要素透视中国企业信息化之路[J].管理世界,2005,21(8):153-155. 被引量：38
3谭久均.ERP实施绩效研究:回顾与展望[J].财经理论与实践,2006,27(5):103-107. 被引量：14
4刘霞李建明.我国大企业供应链管理的现状.企业研究参考,2007,(8).
5Akkermans, H.A., Bogerd, P., Yucesan, P.E.,Van Wassen-hove, L., 1999, "The Impact of ERP on Supply Chain Management: Exploratory Findings from a European Delphi Study", European Journal of Operational Research, 146, 284-301.
6Cotteleer, M. J., 2002, "Order Lead-time Improvement Following Enterprise- IT Implementation: Aan Empirical Study",Working Paper, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
7McMee, A., 2002, "The Impact of Enterprise Information Technology Adoption on Operational Performance: An Empirical Investigation" ,Production and Operations Management, 11 (1),33-53.
8Davenport, T.H., 1998, "Putting the Enterprise Into the Enterprise System", Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121-131.
9Bancroft, N.H., Seip, H., Sprengel, A., 1998, "Implementing SAP R/3, Seconded", Manning Publications Co., Greenwich, MA.
10Scott, J.E., Vessey, I., 2000, "Implementing Enterprise Resource Planning Systems:The Role of Learning from Failure",Information Systems Frontiers, 2(2), 213-232.