期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合与T管留置的疗效比较 被引量:43

Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合与T管引流的手术疗效。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月—2012年8月施行的71例腹腔镜下胆总管探查取石术患者的临床资料,其中一期缝合39例(缝合组),T管引流32例(引流组),比较两组术中、术后情况。结果:两组手术时间、术后住院时间、开始流质时间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),但缝合组腹腔引流时间及总住院费用明显少于引流组(均P<0.05)。两组术后胆瘘、胆管炎、残余结石等并发症发生率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。两组均无术后胆管狭窄和死亡病例。结论:腹腔镜胆管探查术后一期缝合在术后引流时间和治疗费用方面比与T管引流更具优势,在合适的适应证下应作为治疗的首选。 Objective: To compare the effects of primary closure and T-tube drainage following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Methods: The clinical data of 71 patients who underwent LCBDE for stone extraction from January 2011 to August 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 71 patients, 39 cases underwent primary closure (suture group) and 32 cases received T-tube drainage (drainage group) after LCBDE. The intra- and postoperative conditions between the two groups were compared. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the postoperative hospital stay and time to liquid costs in suture group were significantly lower of postoperative complications such as bile 1 showed no statistical difference (P〉0.05). No intake (all P〉0.05), but abdominal operative time, length of drainage time and hospital than those of drainage group (both P〈0.05). The incidences eakage, cholangitis and retained stones between the two groups bile duct stricture or death occurred in either group.Conclusion: Primary closure has reduced duration of postoperative drainage and hospital cost compared with T-tube drainage following LCBDE, and thus, it could be proposed as the method of first choice under appropriate indications.
出处 《中国普通外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期140-144,共5页 China Journal of General Surgery
关键词 胆结石 外科学 胆总管探查术 腹腔镜 一期缝合 T管引流 Cholelithiasis/surg Common Bile Duct Exploration, Laparoscopic Primary Closure T-tube Drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1巴明臣,毛静熙,陈训如,周正东.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆漏的原因及对策[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(2):77-78. 被引量:89
  • 2Zhang WJ, Xu GF, Wu GZ, et al. Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage: a randomized clinical trial[J]. J Surg Res, 2009, 157(1):el-e5.
  • 3Hwang JC, Kim JH, Yoo BM, et al. Temporary placement of a newly designed, fully covered, self-expandable metal stent for refractory bile leaks[J]. Gut Liver, 2011, 5(I):96-99.
  • 4Wang AY, Ellen K, Berg CL, et al. Fully covered self-expandable metallic stents in the management of complex biliary leaks:preliminary dala-a ease series[J]. Endoscopy, 2009, 41 (9):781-786.
  • 5黄秋林,龚连生,李浩.腹腔镜探查术在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后胆漏诊治中的应用[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(4):358-360. 被引量:10
  • 6何群,汤恢焕,周军.腹腔镜胆总管探查拔除T管后胆瘘16例临床分析[J].中国普通外科杂志,2012,21(9):1172-1174. 被引量:14
  • 7Tan KK, Shela! VG, Liau KH, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: our first 50 cases[J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2010, 39(2):136-142.
  • 8Berthou JCil. Dron B. Charbonneau P, et al. Evaluation of laparoseopic Ireatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective series of 505 patients: indications and results[J]. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(11):1970 1974.
  • 9赵国刚,李德新,李强,田云鸿,戴毅.胆道镜联合钬激光经T管窦道治疗肝内外胆管残余结石[J].中国普通外科杂志,2012,21(8):922-925. 被引量:11
  • 10Anwar S, Rahim R, Agwunobi A, et al. The role of ERCP in management of retained bile duct stones after laparoseopie cholecysteetomy[J]. N Z Med J, 2004, 117(1203):U1102.

二级参考文献58

共引文献195

同被引文献336

引证文献43

二级引证文献515

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部