个人信用信息隐私保护的制度构建——欧盟及美国立法对我国的启示被引量：27

Construction of Personal Credit Information Privacy Protection System

导出

摘要个人信用信息是能够反映特定个人的信用状况的各种信息资料的总和,在性质上属于个人隐私的范畴。在个人信用信息隐私的立法保护上,主要存在欧盟的统一立法和美国的分散立法两种立法模式。我国个人信用信息隐私保护立法应当立足于我国的实际并借鉴欧盟和美国立法中的合理之处,确立统一立法与行业立法并举的折中模式。通过统一立法确立个人信用信息隐私保护的基本原则和最低标准,并在此基础之上进一步完善个人信用信息隐私保护的行业立法,以健全我国个人信用信息隐私保护的法律体系。 Personal credit information is the summation of various information and data which is able to reflect the credit stand- ing of specific person and has the nature of individual privacy. There are mainly two legislative models in the world for the protection of personal credit information privacy, namely, the centralized legislation in the EU and the decentralized legislation in the USA. The legislation for the protection of personal credit information privacy in China should be based on the reality of China, use the rational experiences of the EU and the USA in legislation for reference, and adopt an eclectic model which attaches equal impor- tance to centralized legislation and industrial legislation. Using unified legislation to determine the basic principles and lowest stand- ards for the protection of personal credit information privacy, and based on this further perfect the industrial legislation for the pro- tection of personal credit information privacy so as to improve the legal system in China in this regard.

作者姚朝兵

机构地区南京大学法学院

出处《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期20-24,共5页 Information Studies:Theory & Application

关键词个人信用信息隐私保护立法 personal credit information privacy protection legislation

分类号 D913 [政治法律—民商法学] D912.28 [政治法律—经济法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1周悦丽.个人信用信息的法律保护研究[J].法学杂志,2007,28(4):158-160. 被引量：10
2徐志军,周悦丽.个人信用信息数据库在我国征信体系构建中的法律定位分析[J].河北法学,2008,26(1):74-80. 被引量：10
3马特.隐私语义考据及法律诠释[J].求索,2008(5):131-133. 被引量：9
4王利明,徐明,杨立新.人格权法新论[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1994.
5齐爱民.美国信息隐私立法透析[J].时代法学,2005,3(2):109-115. 被引量：29
6KUNERC.欧盟的隐私和数据保护[M]//温珍奎,译.个人信用信息保护前沿问题研究.北京:法律出版社,2006.
7HOBBY S P. The EU protection directive : implementing a world- wide data regime and how the U. S. position has progressed [J].International Law &Management Review,2005 (1) :166.
8LEVIN A, NICHOLSON M J. Privacy law in the United States, the EU and Canada: the allure of the middle ground[J]. U- niversity of Ottawa Law & Technology Journal, 2005 (2).
9GODBEY B. Data protection in the European Union: current status and future implications [ J ]. A Journal of Law and Poli- cy. 2006 (2): 806.
10CATEFH.美国的隐私保护[M]//苏苗罕,译.个人信息保护前沿问题研究.北京:法律出版社,2006:73.

二级参考文献36

1Joel R. Reidenberg. Privacy Wrongs in Search of Remedies [J]. Hastings Law Journal, 2003, (54).
2David H. Flaherty. Privacy in Colonial New England [M].Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1972.
3Jonathan Elliot. Debates in the Several Stale Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution [M]. New York: Lenox Hill Pub, 1974.
4David J. Seipp. The Pdght to Privacy in American History [M].Cambridge: Harvard University Program on Information Resources Policy Pub., 1978.
5Warren & Brandeis. The Right to Privacy [J]. Harvard Law Review, 1890, (4).
6William Prosser. Privacy [J].Calffornia Law Review, 1960, (48).
7United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Records, Computers, and the Rights of Citizens, Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems [R].Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1973.
8United States Federal Trade Commission.Privacy Online: A Report to the Congress [R].Washington, D.C.: FTC, 1998.
9Fred H. Cate. Privacy in the Irformation Age [M]. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1997.
10陈起行.《信息隐私权法理探讨—以美国法为中心》[J].政大法律评论,2000,(64).