期刊文献+

“大辩论”与国际关系学科史的自我意象建构 被引量:5

The Great Debates and the Construction of the Self-Image of the History of International Relations Discipline
原文传递
导出
摘要 "大辩论"作为国际关系学科发展的部分事实以及叙述方式,它大体建构了五次大辩论的学科"正统自我意象"。这一正统自我意象具有概观、简易和快捷的优势,使得学科对外呈现出一种知识整体性和独立性,但是,它也造成了学科历史的一些失实与扭曲、美国国际关系学的知识中心感和知识傲慢、学科历史的碎化感、当下主义的"辉格式的历史"的流行、现实或潜在的学科实践冲突等知识缺陷和学术实践缺陷。基于此,大辩论式的学科历史必须予以修正乃至超越。对于大辩论式学科历史的修正需要反思"虚假的第一次大辩论"、重新发现大辩论所掩盖的其他知识贡献、转变大辩论的"战斗"意象为"辩论与对话并存"的友好意象、借助范式概念建构一个相对连贯的进步的学科历史;对于大辩论式学科历史的超越需要基于"无政府状态下的国家及其共同体的命运"的问题意识来展开国际关系思想体系内部的代际知识演进及其彼此间的对话关系,使国际关系学科历史由"理论间的辩论史"走向"问题意识-思想体系的对话史"。 As a partial fact and a story-telling vehicle,the great debates constructedthe history of the discipline of international relations(IR) as successive ' five great debates'.Such a self-image has provided an overview of the history of the discipline and made it easily grasped.Although the self-image makes IR studies seemingly integral and independent,it actually distorts the history,gives the impression of American international relations intellectual arrogance and indifference to out-of-America intellectual contributions to IR studies,and intensifies real or potential intellectual conflicts between scholars.According to the great debates,IR studies appears to be a dividing discipline and the Whig interpretation of its history has been dominant.For the time being,the great debates can continue with some revisions,such as reflecting on the false first great debate,exploring the formerly neglected thoughts or approaches,emphasizing the dialogue between schools of thought,and employing the tool of scientific paradigm to.reconstruct a relatively coherent and integrated history of the discipline.In the long run,we must transcend the great-debate story-telling way and introduce a new framework for analysis. 'The dialogue between problematique and theories' provides a better story-telling way.Centering on the problematique 'state and its community under the anarchy',theories of international relations evolve between generations,and a complementary and conversational relationship can be established between them.Then a more scientific and reasonable history of the discipline will be constructed.
作者 石贤泽
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期134-153,159-160,共20页 World Economics and Politics
关键词 国际关系理论 大辩论 国际关系学科史 自我意象 建构 international relations theory the great debates the history of international relations discipline self-image construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献269

共引文献166

同被引文献161

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部