摘要
目的对比分析人工全髋关节置换术与股骨头置换术两种术式治疗高龄股骨颈骨折的临床疗效。方法分别应用人工全髋关节置换术与股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折患者32例及28例,比较两组的手术优良率及两组的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后引流量及并发症情况。结果 A组的优良率达90.6%,明显高于B组,A组的手术时间长于B组,A组术中出血量明显多于B组,A组术后并发症的例数明显少于B组,差异均存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论人工半髋置换术治疗高龄股骨颈骨折具有创伤小、操作简单、并发症少等优点,其疗效明显优于人工股骨头置换术,值得推广和应用。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty femoral head replacement two surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures. Methods By application of total hip arthroplaSty femoral head arthroplasty treatment of femoral neck fractures in 32 patients and 28 cases were compared between the two groups of the excellent and good rate arid tWO groups of surgical time, blood loss, duration of hospitalization, surgery after cited traffic and complicatioos, Results The excellent rate of A group was 90.6% ,was significantly higher than group B,the surgery tir0e of A group was longer than group B, blood loss of group A was significantly more than group B, A postop- erative complications of A group was significantly less than the number of group B,there was a statistically significant differenee（P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture is significantly superior to the femoral head arthroplasty, is worthy of promotion and application.
出处
《中国现代医生》
2013年第9期41-42,共2页
China Modern Doctor
