期刊文献+

普通话可接受噪声级的复测信度分析 被引量:6

Test-retest reliability of Mandarin acceptable noise level
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:通过对普通话可接受噪声级(M-ANL)材料进行复测信度评估,分析正常人的ANL与对噪声耐受的关系。方法:选取听力言语正常的21~28岁青年受试者30例,对其进行M-ANL测试,再分别于1周及2周后,以同样的测试条件进行第2次复测。每位受试者于第1次测试前填写1份对噪声耐受问卷。使用SPSS17.0软件对结果进行统计学分析。结果:3次ANL值分别为(8.1±2.9)dB S/N、(7.4±2.2)dB S/N、(7.6±2.5)dB S/N,两两配对t检验及Pearson相关分析,P=0.079、0.147、0.588,r=0.722、0.746、0.849。ANL与问卷中7个问题得分均r<0.3。结论:M-ANL测试具有较好的复测信度;个体对噪声的耐受与ANL无关,其并不能正确地自我判断实际对噪声的接受能力。 Objective:To evaluate test-retest reliability of Mandarin acceptable noise level(M-ANL) test materials.Method:M-ANL was evaluated during three test sessions approximately one week apart,by testing 30 Mandarin-speaking people aged from 21 to 28 with normal aural/oral communicational abilities.The participants completed the preference for background noise questionnaire before the first session.Analysis of the test-retest results were administered by SPSS 17.0(Statistically Package for the Social Sciences Software Version 17.0).Result:ANLs in the three sessions were(8.1±2.9),(7.4±2.2),(7.6±2.5)dB S/N,respectively.The correlation coefficients were 0.722,0.746 and 0.849 between two of the three sessions.The correlation coefficients of the ANL and 7 questions of the questionnaire were below 0.3.Conclusion:M-ANL test materials are found to have good test-retest reliability.Listeners’ preference for background noise is not related to their acceptance of background noise.Listeners cannot accurately assess their ability to accept background noise.
出处 《临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第7期352-354,358,共4页 Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head And Neck Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No:81070784) 北京市自然科学基金资助项目(No:7122034) 首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院科研基金资助项目(No:2012-YJJ-003)
关键词 可接受噪声级 复测信度 普通话 噪声耐受 acceptable noise level test-retest reliability Mandarin noise tolerance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1ROGERS D S, HARKRIDER A W, BURCHFIELD S B, et al. The influence of listener's gender on the accept- ance of background noise[J]. J Am PLead Audiol, 2003, 14:372-382.
  • 2TAMPAS J W, HARKRIDER A W. Auditory evoked potentials in females with high and low acceptance of background noise when listening to speech[J]. J Acoust Soc Am, 2006,119 : 1548- 1561.
  • 3NABELEK A K, TAMPAS J W, BURCHFIELD S B. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions[J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res,2004,47:1001-1011.
  • 4NABELEK A K, FREYALDENHOVEN M C, TAM- PAS J W, et al. Acceptable noise level as a predictor of hearing aid use[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2006,17 : 626 - 639.
  • 5MENDEL L L, DANHAUER J L. Test development and standardization [ M]//MENDEL L L, DAN- HAUER J L,eds. Audiologic evaluation and manage- ment and speech perception assessment. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group, 1997 : 7- 13.
  • 6FREYALDENHOVEN M C, SMILEY D F, MUENCHEN R A, et al. Acceptable noise level: reliability measures and comparin to preference for background tmds[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2006, 17:640-648.
  • 7CHEN J,ZHANG H, PLYLER P N, et al. Develop- ment and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signalcontent on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in China's Mainland [J].Int Audiol, 2011,50 : 354- 360.
  • 8陈建勇,张华,陈静,陈雪清,郭连生,曹文,吴燕君,李玉玲.普通话可接受噪声级测试材料的开发与等价性评估[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2011,18(3):136-140. 被引量:21
  • 9冀飞,郗昕.言语测听材料的复测信度评估[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2009,17(3):209-211. 被引量:8
  • 10FREYALDENHOVEN M C, NABELEK A K, BURCH- FIELD S B, et al. Acceptable noise level as a measure of directional hearing aid benefit[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 2005,16 : 228- 236.

二级参考文献32

  • 1张华,王硕,王靓,陈静,岳朋朋,郭连生,赵小燕.普通话言语测听材料的数字化录制与等价性分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2006,20(22):1011-1015. 被引量:23
  • 2Caeace AT, Mc Farland DJ. Central auditory processing disor der in school aged children: A critical review[J].J Speech Lang Hear Res,1998,41: 355.
  • 3彦艳,徐勇勇.效度与信度评价[M].见:孙振球,主编.医学统计学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.485-495.
  • 4Bentler RA. List equivalency and test--retest reliability of the speech in noisetest[J]. Am J Audiol,2000,9;84.
  • 5Terband H. Automating the measurement of the speech recep tion threshold in noise-- A comparison of adaptive procedures in key word vs whole sentence scoring[M]. TNO Utrecht University Master Thesis, 2006.1-10.
  • 6Bamford J, Wilson I. Methodological considerations and practical aspects of the BKB sentence lists[M]. In: Bench J, Bamford J,eds. Speech--hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-- impaired children. London, UK: Academic Press, 1979. 146- 187.
  • 7Plomp R, Mimpen AM. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences[J]. Audiology,1979, 18:43.
  • 8Kirk KI, Eisenberg LS,Martinez AS, et al. Lexical neighborhood test:Test--retest reliability and interlist equivalency[J]. J Am Acad Audiol, 1999,10: 113.
  • 9Cameron S, Dillon H. The listening in spatialized noise--sentences test (LISN--S) : test retest reliability study[J]. Int J Audiol, 2007, 46:145 .
  • 10Wagener K, Josvassen JL, Ardenkjaer R. Design optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise[J].Int J Audiol, 2003, 42:10.

共引文献27

同被引文献30

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部