企业间专利合作的多学科知识网络研究被引量：12

Research on Multidisciplinary Knowledge Network of Chinese Enterprise-Enterprise Patent Cooperation

下载PDF

导出

摘要企业间专利合作形成的多学科知识网络是提高创新绩效和实施多学科研发的重要网络平台。通过中国知识产权局公开的1985-2010年的36731条企业间专利合作数据,用社会网络分析方法分析了多学科知识网络的实际动态变化过程及其网络结构特点,以及网络中学科的分布特点。实证结果表明,这个多学科知识网络结构较完善,学科间的知识流动载体即企业较多,对知识流动和创新将产生很好的促进作用;同时也希望本文的分析方法和分析结果为国家和企业的创新战略提供理论参考和实证资料。 Multidisciplinary knowledge network for enterprise-enterprise patent cooperation is an important network platform to improve innovation performance and to implement multidisciplinary and multisectoral cooperation. The actual dynamic variation and structure char- acteristics of the network and the distribution characteristics of disciplines in the network are analyzed through social network analysis based on data of 36,731 pieces of enterprise-enterprise cooperation patents during the period from 1985 to 2010 from the State Intellectual Prop- erty Office of the People＇ Republic of China. The multidisciplinary knowledge network as the result shows its structure is comparatively perfect and the carders for knowledge flow among subjects, the enterprises） are many, which has a positive influence on knowledge flow and innovation performance. At the same time, the method and the result of the analysis in this study are helpful for the innovation strategy of both the government and the enterprises as theoretical reference and empirical material.

作者叶春霞余翔李卫

机构地区华中科技大学管理学院温州出入境检验检疫局

出处《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第4期113-120,共8页 Journal of Intelligence

基金浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题"基于企业间专利合作网络的开放式创新研究-1985~2010中国专利数据"(编号:12JCGL25) 国家自科基金"引导技术创新的专利信息挖掘与分析技术研究"(编号:71072033)

关键词专利合作多学科知识网络专利分类社会网络分析网络结构 patent cooperation multidisciplinary knowledge network patent classification social network analysis network structure

分类号 F062.4 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1Nissani M. Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinafity:The Case for Inter- disciplinafity Knowledge and Research [ J ]. The Social Science Journal, 1997,34(2) :201-216.
2Ivanitskaya L, Clark D, Montgomery G, et al. Interdisciplinary Learning:Process and Outcomes [ J ]. Innovative Higher Educa- tion ,2002,27 ( 2 ) :95 - 111.
3Hargadon A. How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth About How Companies Innovate[ M ]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press ,2003.
4Malerba F. Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production [ J ]. Research Policy, 2002,31 (2) :247-64.
5Jorge Alves, Mafia Jos Marques, Irina Saur, Pedro Marques. Creativity and Innovation through Multidisciplinary and Multisec- toral Cooperation [ J ]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2007(16) :27-34.
6van Knippenberg D, De Dreu C K W, Homan A C. Work GroupDiversity and Group Performance:An Integrated Model and Re- search agenda[ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2004,89 (6) : 1008-1022.
7Okada T, Simon H A. Collaborative Discovery in a Scientific Do- main [ J ]. Cognitive Science, 1997 ( 21 ) : 109-146.
8Antonio A L, Chang M J, Hakuta K, Kenny D, Levin S, Milem J. Effects of Racial Diversityon Complex Thinking in College Students [J ]. Psychological Science,2004 ( 15 ) : 507 - 510.
9Dell'Era C, Verganti R. Collaborative Strategies in Design-inten- sive Industries : Knowledge Diversity and Innovation [ J ]. Long Range Planning, 2010,43 ( 1 ) : 123 - 141.
10Nijstad B A, Stroebe W. How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation Ingroups [ J ]. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2006 ( 10 ) : 186 -213.