期刊文献+

医学期刊印刷版取消关键词著录的可行性分析 被引量:1

Feasibility analysis of cancelling key words in printed medical journals
原文传递
导出
摘要 鉴于国际医学期刊编辑委员会《向生物医学期刊投稿的统一要求》中有关关键词规定部分与我国国家标准不一致,本研究选取国内外知名医学期刊进行调查,分析各刊的稿约、摘要后关键词著录情况,同时对2个医学文摘型数据库PubMed及CBMdisc进行调查,以探讨医学期刊印刷版取消关键词著录的可行性。结果表明,医学期刊印刷版中不必著录关键词,主题标引工作可以由数据库专业标引人员在对各刊电子数据进行加工时完成。这应该是医学期刊的一个发展趋势。 Given that prescriptions on key words in Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals ( International Committee of Medical Journal Editors ) are inconsistent with Chinese National Standards, we analyze the feasibility of cancelling key words in printed medical journals. We selected 15 well-known medical journals at home and abroad to analyze their instructions for authors and to find out whether all abstracts are followed by key words; in addition, we investigated two medical bibliographic databases, PubMed and CBMdisc. We find that key words are not necessary to appear "after the abstracts in printed edition, but should be added by professional indexers while processing the electronic data. This will be a development trend in medical journals.
出处 《编辑学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期195-197,共3页 Acta Editologica
关键词 主题标引 关键词 编辑加工 稿约 subject indexing key words editing information for authors
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献51

共引文献33

同被引文献17

  • 1董景五,薛欣.疾病和有关健康问题的国际统计分类[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:332.
  • 2De Angelis C,Pellicano R,Manfr S F, Rizzetto M. Endoscopic ultrasound in the 2013 preoperative evalua- tion of gastric cancer[J]. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol, 2013,59:1-12.
  • 3Heller S J,Tokar J L. Current status of advanced gas- trointestinal endoscopy training fellowships in the U- nited States[J]. Adv Med Educ Pract,2011,2 :25-34.
  • 4Yasufuku K. Current clinical applications of endobron chial ultrasoundi-J. Expert Rev Respir Med, 2010,4: 491-498.
  • 5李兆申.中国消化内镜诊疗技术发展与展望[c].第十届国际治疗内镜及消化病学术会议专题报告及论文汇编,2010.
  • 6Higgins J P T, Green S. Cochrane handbook for sys- tematic reviews of interventions. Version 5. 1.0 [EB/ OL]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. (2011-03) [2014-03-06]. http://www, cochrane-handbook, org.
  • 7Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,Altman D G; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses;the PRISMA statement[J]. Ann In- tern Med,2009,151: 264-269.
  • 8Pocock S J, Travison T G, Wruck L M. Figures in clinical trial reports;current practice scope for im- provement[J]. Trials, 2007,8 ; 36.
  • 9Whiting P, Rutjes A W, Reitsma J B, Bossuyt P M, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included insystematic reviews[J]. BMC Med Res Meth- odol,2003,3 : 25.
  • 10Whiting P F,Rutjes A W,Westwood M E,Mallett S, Decks J J,Reitsma J B, et al. QUADAS-2 :a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy stud- ies[J]. Ann Intern Med,2011,155:529-536.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部