期刊文献+

替吉奥化疗应用于中晚期肺癌的近期疗效和安全性评估 被引量:4

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of Tegafur chemotherapy in the treatment of middle-advanced lung cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨替吉奥治疗中晚期肺癌的近期疗效和安全性。方法选择2010年1月至2012年4月收治的中晚期肺癌患者83例,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,对照组患者(40例)采用多西他赛联合顺铂治疗,观察组患者(43例)采用多西他赛联合替吉奥治疗,观察两组患者的治疗情况。结果观察组患者的有效率为81.4%,明显高于对照组的57.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患者的血清中肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、癌抗原125(CA125)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平均明显改善,且观察组患者改善更为明显,组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者不良反应发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论替吉奥治疗中晚期肺癌近期疗效满意,安全性可靠,能够明显改善患者血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CA125和NSE的水平。 Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of tegafur chemotherapy in the treatment of middle-advanced lung cancer. Methods From January 2010 to April 2012 in our hospital, 83 cases of middle-advanced lung cancer were selected and randomly divided into two groups according to random num- ber table, the control group (40 cases) treated with docetaxel and cisplatin, the observation group (43 ca- ses) treated with docetaxel and tegafur, the treatment data of two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The effective rate of observation group was 81.4%, significantly higher than 57. 5% of the control group, the difference was statistically significant between two groups (P 〈 0. 05) ; after treatment, the ser- um tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level of patients in two groups were significantly improved, and the observation group improved more obvious, the differences were statistically significant between two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; the side effects oc- curred in the observation group was significantly less than that of the control group, the difference was statis- tically significant between two groups (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions Tegafur chemotherapy in the treatment of middle-advanced lung cancer has satisfactory clinical efficacy and reliable security, can significantly improve patients' serum markers CEA, CA125 and NSE level, it is worthy referred in clinic.
作者 阎飞 李兴华
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2013年第4期359-361,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 肺肿瘤 药物疗法 替吉奥 多西他赛 顺铂 Lung neoplasms Drug therapy Tegafur Docetaxel Cisplatin
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献41

共引文献97

同被引文献44

  • 1施春雷,韩宝惠.ASCO不可手术切除的非小细胞肺癌治疗指南——2003新版推荐指南[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):115-124. 被引量:114
  • 2林丽珠,陶志广,周岱翰.WHO标准和RECIST在肺癌多中心疗效评价的比较[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(5):253-255. 被引量:41
  • 3白春学.内科学[M].第8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:3.
  • 4Ferlay J,Shin HR,Bray F,et al.Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008:GLOBOCAN 2008[J].Int J Cancer 2010,127(12):2893-2917.
  • 5Leighl NB.Treatment paradigms for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer:first-,second-,and third-line[J].Curr Oncol,2012,19(Suppl 1):S52-S58.
  • 6Schiller JH,Harrington D.Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2002,346:92-98.
  • 7Rosell R,Carcereny E,Gervais R,et al.Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as frst-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer(EURTAC):a multicentre,open-label,randomised phase 3 trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2012,13(3):239-246.
  • 8Inoue A,Kobayashi K,Maemondo M,et al.Updated overall survival results from a randomized phase III trial comparing gefitinib with carboplatin-paclitaxel for chemo-naive non-small cell lung cancer with sensitive EGFRgene mutations(NEJ002)[J].Ann Oncol,2013,24(1):54-59.
  • 9Scagliotti GV,Parikh P,von Pawel J,et al.Phase Ⅲ study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(21):3543-51.
  • 10Stevenson JP,Langer CJ,Somer RA,et al.Phase 2 trial of maintenance bevacizumab alone after bevacizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin in advanced,nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer[J].Cancer,2012,118(22):5580-5587.

引证文献4

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部