摘要
经学和史学是中国传统学术的两门学问,两者关系密切,所以古人有"五经亦史"、"六经皆史"等经史同一的说法。但是,当经学和史学所遵循的准绳与求真的目的彼此相异,特别是当在求真过程中两者出现冲突甚至矛盾时,这种同一又如何可能?通过分析古人对《春秋》经传"召陵之会"的考辨可知,经史同一之所以可能,其关键在于经义和史义的互涉。正是在经义与史义的求真与相互推求中,两者才有可能得以融通。
Confucianism and historiography are both Chinese traditional academics, and they had close relationship. Therefore, ancient Chinese scholars believed that there was consistence between Confucianism and historiography, as they said, ＂Five classics are all his- tory＂ or ＂Six classics are all history＂. However, they had different criteria and purposes of truth-seeking, especially when there was a conflict in the process of truth-seeking. In that case, how is the consistence possible？ By analyzing the textual research of ancient scholars on ＂Shaoling Conference＂ of Chun Qiu Jing Zhuan, we found that the consistence lies in the intertextuahty between Confucianism and historiography. The consistence may be achieved only in the pursuit of true meaning of them and inference from each other.
出处
《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2013年第2期50-55,60,共7页
Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
经学
史学
《春秋》
Confucianism
historiography
Chtm Qiu
