期刊文献+

微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾铸型结石分析——附86例报告 被引量:2

Analysis of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of renal staghorn calculi:a report of 86 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨微创经皮肾镜取石术(mini-PCNL)治疗肾铸型结石的临床疗效及安全性。方法:选择187例肾铸型结石患者,随机分为A组101例、B组86例,A组采用开放性手术取石治疗,B组采用mini-PCNL取石治疗,比较两种术式术中和术后的相关疗效及安全性指标。结果:A组结石清除率、术中输血率、并发症发生率分别为23%、80%、10%;B组则分别为93%、2%、1%,两组的输血率、结石清除率、并发症发生率比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。与A组相比,B组术中出血量较少,手术时间、住院时间较短(P均<0.01)。结论:mini-PCNL治疗肾铸型结石具有安全性好、结石清除率高等优点,应作为肾铸型结石的首选手术治疗方法。 Objective: To explore the clinical effect and safety of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithot- omy (mini-PCNL) on renal staghorn caleuli. Methods: One hundred and eighty-seven patients with renal staghorn calculi were selected and divided into two groups. Patients in group A ( n = 101 ) were treated with open surgery, and patients in group B (n =-86) were treated with mini-PCNL. The indices of clinical effect and safety in both groups were compared. Results: The stone clearance rate, transfusion rate, complication rate were 23% , 80% , 10% in group A, and 93%, 2%, 1% in group B, respectively, with significant difference (P 〈0.05). Com- pared with group A, group B turned out with less blood lost, shorter operation duration hospital stay (P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions: Mini-PCNL is a safe and effective option for renal staghorn calculi. It is the preferrable method to choose in surgical treatment for renal staghorn calculi.
出处 《新医学》 2013年第4期256-258,共3页 Journal of New Medicine
关键词 微创经皮肾镜取石术 肾铸型结石 开放手术 Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy Renal staghorn calculi Open surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A, et al. Vascular compli- cations after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors. Urology, 2005, 66: 3840.
  • 2Galvin D J, Pearle MS. The contemporary management of renal and ureteric calculi. BJU Int, 2006, 98: 1283- 1288.
  • 3Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S, et al. Retrograde uret- eroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol, 2009, 23: 1395-1398.
  • 4Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, et al. Comparison of per- cutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde of 2-4cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int, 2012, 109: 1384-1389.
  • 5Soucy F, Ko R, Duvderani M, et al. Pereutaneous neph- rolithotomy for slaghor~l calculi: a single center's experi- ence over 15 years. J Endourol, 2009, 23: 1669-1673.
  • 6Cracco CM, Scoffone CM, Scarpa RM. New developments in pereutaneous techniques for simple and complex branched renal stones. Curr Opin Urol, 2011, 21: 154- 160.
  • 7Kurtulus FO, Fazlioglu A, Tandogdu ZT, et al. Percuta- neous nephrohthotomy: Primary patients versus patients with history of open renal surgery. J Endourol, 2008, 22 : 2671-2675.
  • 8Sofikerim M, Demirci D, Gtilmez I, et al. Does previous open nephrolithotomy affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol, 2007, 21: 401-403.

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部