期刊文献+

测验效度概念的新发展 被引量:18

New Development in Testing Validity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1985年《教育与心理测验标准》(第5版)出版之前,效度研究的核心概念是"效标(criterion)",效度研究被视为一种用"效标"对测验的效度进行证明(verify)、对测验分数做出有效(valid)解释的过程。1985年以后,效度研究的核心概念是"证据(evidence)",效度研究被视为一种通过积累证据对测验的效度进行支持(support)、对测验分数做出合理(reasonable)解释的过程。关于效度的这种理解,突出体现在1999年出版的《教育与心理测验标准》(第6版)中。美国教育协会和美国国家教育测量学会共同组织编写的《教育测量》在业内被称为"教育测量领域的《圣经》"。2006年《教育测量》(第4版)出版以后,效度研究的核心概念演变为"理由(warrant)",效度研究被视为一种通过构造"理由系统"和"理由网络"对效度进行"论证(argument)"、对测验分数做出可接受的(plausible)解释的过程。本文结合笔者的考试实践,介绍了效度概念的新发展。 The key concept of validation used to be criterion. Validation was viewed as a procedure that using criterion to verify the validity interpretation. Since Standards for Educational and of a test and giving test Psychological Testing (5th score a valid edition ) was published in 1985, the key concept of validation changed to be evidence. Validation was viewed as a procedure that cumulating evidence to support the validity of a test and giving test score a reasonable interpretation. After Educational Measurement (4th edition) was published in 2006, the key concept of validation changed to be warrant. Validation was viewed as a procedure that using warrant to argue for the validity of a test and giving test score a plausible interpretation. This paper introduced the new development in testing validation.
作者 谢小庆
出处 《考试研究》 2013年第3期56-64,共9页 Examinations Research
关键词 测验 效度 Test, Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1American Educational Research Association. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (5th Edition) [ M]. Washington, DC:AERA, 1985.
  • 2American Educational Research Association.Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (6th Edition) [ M ]. Washington, DC : AERA, 1999.
  • 3Brennan, R. L. , ed.. Educational Measurement (4th Edition ) [ C ]. Washington, DC: American Council on Education/Praeger, 2006.
  • 4Linn, R. L. , ed.. Educational Measurement (3rd Edition ) [ C ]. Washington, DC : American Council on Education/ORYX Press,1993.
  • 5谢小庆.大学学习能力倾向测验研究报告[A].见:教育部考试中心.能力考试的研究与实践[C].中国人民大学出版社,1999:381-400.
  • 6谢小庆.对测验效度的一些新认识[J].考试研究,2002,1:25-30.
  • 7Owen,D.. None of the above [M]. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC, Lanham, 1999: 27- 39.
  • 8单士兵.高考作文两次改判背后的幸与不幸[N].南方日报,2002,7(22).
  • 9苏步青.学林散叶[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997:250.

共引文献2

同被引文献127

二级引证文献231

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部