期刊文献+

Effects of Different Facilities on Laying Performance,Egg Quality and Air Quality for Layers Under Free Range System 被引量:1

Effects of Different Facilities on Laying Performance,Egg Quality and Air Quality for Layers Under Free Range System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [ Objective] This paper aimed to study the effects of different facilities on laying performance, egg quality and air quality for commercial layers under free range system. [Metbod] The single factorial arrangement was used in the tdal. 2 800 commercial Beijing You Chicken (BYC) at 23 weeks of age were chosen and randomly divided into four groups, three replicates each group, and 210 birds each replicate. The layers lived in loose housing condition with deep litter inside. Group 1 was the control, equipped with standard laying boxes, and flat-type perches; group 2 was e- quipped with common laying boxes, and flat-type perches; group 3 was equipped with common laying boxes, and erect-type perches, and group 4 was equipped with standard laying boxes, and erect-type perches. The laying performance, laying position and egg quality of birds during 24 to 32 weeks of age were recorded and measured, and average NH3, CO~ concentration of each group at 32 weeks of age were measured and detected. [Result] The results showed that laying performance of commercial BYC under loose housing condition were significantly different during 24 -32 weeks of age. The laying rate of the control group equipped with flat-type porches and standard laying boxes (33.25%) was significantly higher than in group equipped with flat-type perches and common laying boxes (21.83%) (P〈0.05), and other two groups (26.04% and 27.48%) (P 〈0.05). The ratio of floor eggs was significantly lower in groups with standard laying boxes than in the groups with common laying boxes (P 〈0. 05), and the laying proportion in the first floor of layer boxes were much higher than those in the second floor ( P 〈 0.05). There were no significant differences on egg quality among the groups (P〉0.05). Average NH3, CO2 concentration of group 3 and 4 at 82 weeks of age were both signifi- cantly higher than of group 1 and 2 (P 〈0.05). [ Conclusion] All of the above indicated that the utilization of facilities could improve layer's laying rate, especially with flat-type perches and standard laying boxes, and the indoor air quality was also affected to some extent. [ Objective] This paper aimed to study the effects of different facilities on laying performance, egg quality and air quality for commercial layers under free range system. [Metbod] The single factorial arrangement was used in the tdal. 2 800 commercial Beijing You Chicken (BYC) at 23 weeks of age were chosen and randomly divided into four groups, three replicates each group, and 210 birds each replicate. The layers lived in loose housing condition with deep litter inside. Group 1 was the control, equipped with standard laying boxes, and flat-type perches; group 2 was e- quipped with common laying boxes, and flat-type perches; group 3 was equipped with common laying boxes, and erect-type perches, and group 4 was equipped with standard laying boxes, and erect-type perches. The laying performance, laying position and egg quality of birds during 24 to 32 weeks of age were recorded and measured, and average NH3, CO~ concentration of each group at 32 weeks of age were measured and detected. [Result] The results showed that laying performance of commercial BYC under loose housing condition were significantly different during 24 -32 weeks of age. The laying rate of the control group equipped with flat-type porches and standard laying boxes (33.25%) was significantly higher than in group equipped with flat-type perches and common laying boxes (21.83%) (P〈0.05), and other two groups (26.04% and 27.48%) (P 〈0.05). The ratio of floor eggs was significantly lower in groups with standard laying boxes than in the groups with common laying boxes (P 〈0. 05), and the laying proportion in the first floor of layer boxes were much higher than those in the second floor ( P 〈 0.05). There were no significant differences on egg quality among the groups (P〉0.05). Average NH3, CO2 concentration of group 3 and 4 at 82 weeks of age were both signifi- cantly higher than of group 1 and 2 (P 〈0.05). [ Conclusion] All of the above indicated that the utilization of facilities could improve layer's laying rate, especially with flat-type perches and standard laying boxes, and the indoor air quality was also affected to some extent.
出处 《Animal Husbandry and Feed Science》 CAS 2013年第2期87-91,共5页 动物与饲料科学(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Funds(No.30972128) Beijing Natural Scince Funds(No.6102010)
关键词 Free range system Facilities Laying performance Egg quality Air quality Free range system Facilities Laying performance Egg quality Air quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1CHEN P, DING L, ZHANG YD, etal. Problems and Countermeasures of rural spread of epidemic prevention[J]. Chinese Poultiy Introduction ,2006, 23( 11) :31. (in Chinese).
  • 2WANG Q. Combined with the traditional free range system choice— rational and modem elements [J]. Livestock and Poultry Industry, 2004,12: 6-8(in Chinese).
  • 3ZHAO XH, GENG AL, YAN DM,ef al. Innovation and developmental trend of poultry breeding mode[J]. China Poultry,2010, 32(3) :55 -57(in Chinese).
  • 4GENG AL. Innovation and developmental trend of poultry breeding mode[J].China Poultry,2010, 32(2):8-11(in Chinese).
  • 5VOSLAROVA E, HANZALEKZ, VECEREK V, ef al. Comparison between laying hen performance in the cage system and the deep litter system on a diet free from animal protein. Acta Veterinaria Bmo[ J],2006, 75 (2): 219 -225.
  • 6WANG XL, XU GY, ZHENG HX, et al. Effects of different feeding methods on production performance and egg quality of blue - eggshell chickens[C]. The Fourteenth National Symposium on Poultry Science, Harbin. 2009(in Chinese).
  • 7ZHAO C. Study on the Effect on egg quality of different strains, feeding models and diets[D]. Baoding; Hebei Agricultural University, 2004(in Chinese).
  • 8石建州,康相涛,孙桂荣,李国喜,韩瑞丽,李效法,李朝云,秦召.不同饲养方式对固始鸡蛋品质的影响研究[J].广东农业科学,2006,33(2):69-71. 被引量:18
  • 9GENG AL, XU B, WANG HH, et al. Effects on laying performance and egg quality of Beijing You Chicken under cage system and free range system with perches [J]. Chinese Poultry, 2010, 33(S): 301 -303(in Chinese).

二级参考文献10

  • 1黄兆铭译.笼养和平养莫斯科鸡的生长发育和骨骼矿质化[J].国外畜牧学:猪与禽,1985,(18):39-39.
  • 2张凤译.产蛋鸡自由放养获得最大产量[J].国外畜牧学:猪与禽,1984,(12):23-23.
  • 3刘占杰,王惠霖..动物性食品卫生学实验实习指导[M]..甘肃农业大学,南京农业大学,,1992..31—33..
  • 4张伟均译.饲料怎样影响禽蛋质量[J].国外畜牧学:猪与禽,1986,(24):61-61.
  • 5兰肯,基尔,贝克尔.食品工业手册[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2002..
  • 6刘文奎 邹奋 方开旺.禽蛋的质量指标及其测定方法[J].国外畜牧学:猪与禽,1986,27:52-54.
  • 7邱祥聘.家禽学[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1993.29-118.
  • 8苏宁.鸡蛋品质的营养调控[J].四川畜牧兽医,2000,27(B07):90-93. 被引量:11
  • 9葛庆联,章双杰.生产中影响蛋壳质量的因素及评价方法的比较和改进[J].中国家禽,2003,25(2):36-38. 被引量:7
  • 10王延新.蛋重大小的控制[J].养禽与禽病防治,2003(3):14-14. 被引量:5

共引文献17

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部