期刊文献+

语言测试效度及其验证模式的嬗变 被引量:55

The evolution of validity and validation in language assessment
原文传递
导出
摘要 效度向来是评价测试质量的重要标准,语言测试也不例外。语言测试的效度及验证模式几乎完全遵从了教育测量理论的发展。本文以教育测量领域中效度观念的演变为线索,从分类、整体、论证三个视角探讨近60年来效度及其验证模式在语言测试领域的应用与创新,并以测试使用论证(AUA)为例,评析基于论证的效度验证模式的优势与不足。 Validity has always been regarded as the key to quality of any assessment, and its role in language assessment is no exception. The evolution of validity and validation in language assessment has advanced mainly along the development of educational measurement. Based on the conceptual changes of validity in educational measurement, this paper deals with the application and innovation of validation in language assessment over the past 60 years in terms of the following three perspectives: categorized, unitary and argumentative. Finally, taking AUA as an example, this paper points out the pros and cons of argument-based approach to validation.
机构地区 北京外国语大学
出处 《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期411-425,481,共15页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research
基金 教育部人文社科重点研究基地北京外国语大学中国外语教育研究中心2012年重大课题"高考英语考试改革研究:考试方案设计及效度论证"(DHA070148)的部分成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献55

  • 1AERA, APA & NCME. 1999. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing [M]. Washington, D. C. : American Psychological Association.
  • 2APA, 1954. Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques[J]. Psychological Bulletin Supplement 51: 1-38.
  • 3APA, AERA & NCME. 1966. Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests andManuals [M]. Washington, D. C. : American Psychological Association.
  • 4Bachman, L. 1990. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing [M]. Oxford; OUP.
  • 5Bachman, L. 2003. Constructing an assessment use argument and supporting claims abouttest taker-assessment task interactions in evidence-centered assessment design [J].Measurement : Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 1 : 63-65.
  • 6Bachman, L. 2005. Building and supporting a case for test use [J]. Language AssessmentQuarterly 2: 1-34.
  • 7Bachman, L. & A. Palmer. 1996. Language Testing in Practice [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 8Bachman, L. &A. Palmer. 2010. Language Assessment in Practice : Developing LanguageAssessments and Justifying Their Use in the Real World [M]. Oxford : OUP.
  • 9Bingham,W. 1937. Aptitudes and Aptitude Testing [M]. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  • 10Briggs,D. 2004. Comment: Making an argument for design validity before interpretive va-lidity [J]. Measurement 2: 171-174.

同被引文献491

引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部