期刊文献+

STEMI与NSTEMI患者合并右束支传导阻滞临床价值的对比研究 被引量:2

Comparison of clinical value of right bundle block in ST elevation myocardial infarction and in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)在急性非sT段抬高心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和急性sT段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的发生率及其对两组患者临床特征和预后的影响。方法收集931例急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的临床资料,将其分为STEMI组和NSTEMI组,且将以上两组分别分为RBBB和无柬支传导阻滞(NBBB)4个亚组,追踪随访1年;分析两组中RBBB和NBBB患者之间临床基线资料、早期治疗方案、院内及出院1年内病死率的差异;使用多自变量Logistic回归法筛选两组患者院内及院外1年病死率升高的独立预测因素。结果@931例患者中,急性NSTEMI患者为224例(24.06%),其中RBBB者16例(7.14%);急性STEMI患者为707例(75.94%),其中RBBB者47例(6.65%)。②与无RBBB患者相比,AMI合并RBBB的急性心肌梗死患者男性较多、年龄更大、并存疾病比率较高、接受急诊再灌注治疗和急性期辅助药物治疗的比率较低。③在STEMI患者中,与NBBB患者相比,RBBB患者心肌酶峰值较高、入院心室射血分数(EF)〈40%的比率较高;RBBB是该组患者院内[53.18%vsl8.48%,P〈0.001,OR=1.5(95%凹1.31—1.73)I及出院1年内长期病死率I17.07%vs6.67%,P=0.019,OR=1.5(95%C11.22—2.07)]升高的独立预测因素。但在NSTEMI患者中,RBBB组患者的心肌酶峰值及入院EF与NBBB者差异无统计学意义,且RBBB不是院内及1年内长期病死率升高的独立预测因素。结论NSTEMI患者合并RBBB并不是院内和长期病死率升高的独立预测因素。 Objective To evaluate the incidence and clinical impact of right bundle branch block (RBBB) in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI) and patients with ST el- evation myocardial infarction(STEMI). Methods Nine hundred and thirty-one patients with AMI were divided into STEMI team and NSTEMI group, each group was sub divided into right bundle branch block (RBBB) group and none bundle branch block (NBBB) group furtherly according to the ECG appear- ance. Patients with left bundle branch block were excluded. The difference of baseline clinical character- istics, short-term inhospital treatment, in hospital and one-year mortality between RBBB group and NBBB groups were analyzed. Independent predictors of raised mortality was screened by Logistic regression step- wise method. Results A total of 16 patients(7. 14% ) with NSTEMI and 47 patients(6. 65% ) with STE- MI presented with RBBB on admission. In general, RBBB patients were older, more often had comorbidi- ties, and less often received short-term inhospital treatment according to guidelines. In STEMI, RBBB pa- tients had higher peak enzyme levels and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) than patients with- out BBB. Right bundle branch block in STEMI was associated with an increased inhospital and long-term mortality. However, peak enzyme levels and LVEF were similar in both groups with and without BBB in NSTEMI. Right bundle branch block in NSTEMI was not independently associated with a worse outcome. Conclusions Unlike RBBB in STEMI, RBBB in NSTEMI is not an independent predictor of inhospital and long-term mortality.
出处 《中国实用医刊》 2013年第11期10-12,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
关键词 急性非ST段抬高心肌梗死 右束支阻滞 临床预后 Acute non-ST elevation myocardial infarction Right bundle branch block Clinical outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1王芳芳,杨朝宽,楚英杰,冯永利,张海波.急性心肌梗死患者新出现右束支阻滞的意义[J].临床心电学杂志,2010,19(6):419-422. 被引量:9
  • 2Widimsky P, Roh6c F, Stdsek J, et al. Primary angioplasty in a-cute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block ; shouldnew onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelinesas an indication for reperfusion therapy[ J] . Eur Heart J,2012 ,33(1 ) :86-95.
  • 3Wong CK, Stewart RA, Gao W, et al. Prognostic differences be-tween different types of bundle branch block during the early phaseof acute myocardial infarction : insights from the hirulog and earlyreperfusion or occlusion ( HERO) -2 trial[ J]. Eur Heart J,2006,27(1) :21-28.
  • 4Kim MC,Ahn Y, Rhew SH,et al. Impact of total occlusion of aninfarct-related artery on long-term mortality in acute non-ST-eleva-tion myocardial infarction patients who und-erwent early percutane-ous coronary intervention [ J] . Int Heart J, 2012 , 53 ( 3 ):160-164.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction.Universal definition of myocardial infartion. J Am Coil Cardiol.2007;50: 2173-2195.
  • 2Go AS, Barron HV, Rundle AC, et al. Bundle-branch block and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators .Ann Intern Med.1998;129: 690-697.
  • 3Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, et al.2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction:a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines:2007Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infartion.J Am Coil Cardiol.2008;51: 210-47.
  • 4Melgarejo-Moreno A, Galcera-Tomas J, Garcia-Alberola A,et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic significance of right bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction:a study in the thrombolytic era.Circulation. 1997;96: 1139-44.
  • 5Nimetz AA, Shubrook SJ, Hurter AM, et al. The significence of bundle branch block during acute myocardial infarcion. Am Heart J. 1975;90(4 ):439.
  • 6Hindman MC, Wagner GS, Jaro M, et al. The clinical significence of bundle branch block complication acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1978 ;58 ( 4 ) :67.
  • 7Iwasaki J, Kunihisa K, et al. Prognostic significance of right bundle branch block in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction. Acta Med Okayama.2009,63( 1 ):25-33.
  • 8James TN and Burch GE:Blood supply of the human interventricular septum.Circulation. 1958;( 17 ):391-396.
  • 9Newby KH, Pisano E, KrucoffMW, et al. Incidence and clinical relevance of the occurrence of bundle-branch block in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy. Circulation. 1996 (94): 2424-2428.
  • 10Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Topoi E J, et al. Acute myocardial infarction and complete bundle branch block at hospital admission:clinical characteristics and outcome in the thrombolytic era.J Am Coil Cardiol. 1998;31:105-110.

共引文献8

同被引文献15

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部