制度如何形塑政策?——基于历史制度主义的视角被引量：17

How Do Institutions Structure Policies? A Perspective of Historical Institutionalism

导出

摘要制度尤其政府体制究竟是如何形塑公共政策的?这一涉及公共政策与行政管理的基本问题,似乎尚未引起国内学术界充分重视。历史制度主义学派提供的分析视角,可使我们更好地理解国家内部政策的延续性和不同国家间政策的变异性,更好地吸取别国与本国在政策制订中的经验与教训。本文通过梳理和探析历史制度主义的理论与方法论特征,揭示它对公共政策研究的制度分析路径,以期对我国公共政策研究与相关制度建设获得有益的启示。 How do institutions, especially government institutions, structure public policies？ This is a fundamental issue related to public policy and administration, but it seems not to be cared about in the domestic academic sphere. Inspired with analytic perspective of Historical Institutionalism, we could better understand policy continuities within countries and policy variations across countries, and better learn about various experiences and lessons from home and abroad. This article tends to figure out the theoretical and methodological characteristics of Historical Institutionalism, explores its approaches of institutional analysis to public policy, and policy research and relevant institutional buildings. expect to gain some meaningful implications for our public

作者张海清

机构地区中山大学政治与公共事务管理学院

出处《中国行政管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期55-59,共5页 Chinese Public Administration

基金中山大学"985工程"三期建设项目中山大学"211工程"三期行政改革与政府治理研究项目的阶段性成果

关键词历史制度主义公共政策政府体制路径依赖中层制度 historical institutionalism, public policy, government institutions, path--dependency, intermediate--level institu-tions

分类号 D630 [政治法律—中外政治制度]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1Ning Sao. ed. Public Policy. Beijing.. College Edu- cation Press. 2000. pp193-194.
2Peters, B. Guy. Institutional Theory in Political Sci- ence the "New Institutionalism ". Trans. by Wang Xiangmin and Duan Hongwei. Shanghai.. Shanghai Century Publisher Group. 2011. p70, p162.
3Steinmo, Sven and Kathleen Thelen.Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth, eds. Structuring Politics. Historical In- stitutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, 1992. p28, p6, p20, pl0, pl0, p12, p13, pll-12, p13, p19-20, p22, p22, p22, p18, plS, p27.
4Immergut, Ellen. The Theoretical Core of the New In- stitutionalism. Politics and Society,1998(1). p23.
5Ma, Shu-yun. Political Science at the Edge of Chaos? The Paradigmatic Implications of Historical Institutionalism. International Political Science Re- view, 2007(1). p65, p65, p65, p66.
6Pierson, Paul. Increasing Return, Path-Dependence and Political Studies. Trans. by Zhu Demi. He Junzhi, Ren Junfeng and Zhu Demi, eds. Selection of New Institutionalism in Political Science. Tianjin:Tianjin People Press,2007. p193. p203-210.
7He Junzhi. Structure, History and Behavior : the Reconstruction of Political Science by Historical In- stitutionalism. Shanghai.. Fudan University Press, 2004. pp239-241, p141.
8Keman, Hans. Comparative Politics: A Distinctive Approach to Political Science? Hans Keman. ed. Comparative Politics: New Directions in Theory and Method. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1993. oo31-57.
9Hall, Peter A. The Movement from Keynesianism to Monetarism.. Institutional Analysis and British Eco- nomic Policy in the 1970s. Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen and Frank Longstreth, eds. Structuring Poli- tics Historical Institutionalism in Comparative A- nalysis, Cambridge University Press, 1992. pp96 -97.
10Zhou Xueguang. Authoritarian Regime and Effective Governing: the Institutional Logic of Contemporary Chinese State Governing. Zhou Xueguang, Liu Shiding and She Xiaoye, eds. State Construction and Government Behavior. Beijing: Chinese Social Sciences Press,2012. ppl3.