摘要
在交通肇事逃逸致人死亡的情形中,指使人和肇事者的主观罪过既存在有故意也存在有过失。在四种情行中两者都可能构成共犯。根据最高人民法院的解释指使人以交通肇事罪的共犯论,且在刑法理论上一般认为交通肇事罪的主观罪过是过失。而传统的共犯理论认为共犯是故意犯罪。由此,理论界和最高人民法院的解释之间无疑产生分歧。运用"行为理论"或许能更好地解读共犯的主观罪过。
There are both intention and negligence in terms of mens rea of his instigators and a perpetrator who causing a traffic accident and his escape results in the victim＇s death.They may constitute an accomplice under four conditions.According to interpretations of the Supreme Court,the instigators shall be joint offenders.However,generally,the mens rea of the perpetrator is negligence in traffic accident crime.What＇s more,the traditional theory about the accomplice maintains that the mens rea of the offender is usually intention.Therefore,there is undoubtedly a difference between the theory and interpretation of Supreme Court.The use of behavior theory may help preferably understand mens rea of joint crime.
出处
《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期112-116,共5页
Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基金
中央高校基本科研业务基金"论犯罪构成的结构与功能"
