期刊文献+

中文版创伤性颅脑损伤患者生活质量量表的信度及效度研究 被引量:17

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a quality of life questionnaire for traumatic brain injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究中文版创伤性颅脑损伤患者生活质量评定量表(QOLIBRI)的信度和效度。方法对符合纳入标准的93例创伤性颅脑损伤患者应用中文版QOLIBRI进行评价,共49例患者资料数据搜集完整,进行统计学分析。通过分析量表内各条目间相关性、量表重测信度及内部同质性,考察其信度;通过检验变量问偏相关性KMO(Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin)检验、巴特利特球形检验(Bartlett‘s test of sphericity)及因子分析对所得结果进行结构效度分析,与情绪量表(HADS)、健康状况简表(sF-36)、扩展的Glasgow预后量表(GOSE)相关性分析,评价其校标关联效度。结果信度分析:量表内部多数条目之间显著相关。 Objective To study the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of an instrument for asses- sing quality of life after traumatic brain injury (QOL|BRI). Methods A total of 49 patients with traumatic brain injury were studied. The test-retest reliability of the instrument was examined by computing intraclass correlation coef- ficients and its internal consistency was examined using Cronbaeh's c~ statistic. Its criterion-related validity was exam- ined using reference instruments such as the HADS, SF-36 and Glasgow outcome scale-extended (GOSE). The Kai- ser-Meyer-Olkin measure and Barlett's test of sphericity as well as factor analysis were used for construct validity tes- ting.
出处 《中华物理医学与康复杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期356-359,共4页 Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
关键词 颅脑损伤 生活质量 评定量表 信度 效度 Quality of life Traumatic brain injury Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Von Steinbtichel N, Wilson L, Gibbons H, et al. Quality of life after brain injury ( QOLIBRI): scale validity and correlates of quality of life.J Neurotrauma, 2010,27:1157-1165.
  • 2TruelleJL, Von Steinbuchel N, Wild KV, et al. The QOLIBRI to-wards a quality of life tool after traumatic brain injury current develop-ment in Asia. Acta Neurochir Wien,2008,101 :125-129.
  • 3Hawthorne G, Kaye AH, Gruen R, et al. Traumatic brain injury and quality of life: initial Australian validation of the QOLIBRI.J Clin Neurosci, 2011 ,18: 197 -202.
  • 4Nell V, Yates DW ,Kruger. An extended Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS-E) with enhanced sensitivity to mild brain injury. Arch Phys Med Reha-bil, 2000, 81 :614-617.
  • 5Nichol AD, Higgins AM, Gabbe BJ, et al. Measuring functional and quality of life outcomes following major head injury: common scales and checklists. Injury, 2011 ,42 :281-287.
  • 6Green RE, Colella B, Hebert DA, et al. Prediction of return to pro- ductivity after severe traumatic brain injury: investigations of optimal neuropsychological tests and timing of assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2008,89: S51-S60.
  • 7CorriganJD, Selassie A W , OrmanJA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury.J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2010,25 :72-80.
  • 8PonsfordJ, Draper K, Schonberger M. Functional outcome 10 years after traumatic brain injury: its relationship with demographic, injury severity, cognitive and emotional status.J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2008,14 :233-242.
  • 9Von Steinbuchel N, Petersen C, Bullinger M, et al. Assessment of health-related quality of life in persons after traumatic brain injury development of the QOLIBRI, a specific measure. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2005,93 :43-49.
  • 10Shukla D, Devi BI, Agrawal A. Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2011,113:435-441.

同被引文献172

引证文献17

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部