期刊文献+

18F-FLT和18F-FDG评价食管癌细胞照射后超早期生物学反应 被引量:1

Using 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG to evaluate the ultra-early biological response of esophageal carcinomacells after irradiation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 比较18F-氟代脱氧胸腺嘧啶(18F-FLT)和18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)在反映食管癌细胞受照后超早期生物学反应的差异.方法 将人食管癌Eca-109细胞分别接受5、10、15 Gy剂量X射线照射,照射后2、4、8h检测细胞对18F-FDG和18F-FLT摄取率的变化,以及细胞相对存活率和ATP表达情况的变化.结果 5 Gy照射后2、4h,细胞对18F-FDG摄取率与对照组相比分别减少了9.45%和16.4%,差异无统计学意义;但15 Gy照后2h,对18F-FDG摄取率却增加了26.5%(=3.04,P<0.05),其余照射组对18F-FDG摄取率均有明显减少(F=25.75,P<0.05).5 Gy照后2h,18F-FLT摄取率(3.65±0.41)%与对照组(4.00±0.42)%相比,差异无统计学意义,其余照射组对18F-FLT摄取率与对照组比较均有明显减少(F=33.93,P<0.05).在5、10、15 Gy照后2、4、8h,各组细胞相对存活率差异无统计学意义.经不同剂量照射后,细胞对18F-FLT摄取率与ATP浓度之间的相关性(r=0.887,P<0.05)优于18F-FDG与ATP浓度之间的相关性(r=0.622,P>0.05).结论 18F-FDG和18 F-FLT两者均可反映食管癌细胞照射后超早期生物学反应,18F-FLT比18F-FDG能较好地反映食管癌细胞照射后超早期生物学反应. Objective To compare the difference of 3'-deoxy-3'-18F-fluorothymidine ( 18 F-FLT) and 2'-deoxy-2'-18F-fluoro-D-glucose (is F-FDG) in the ultra-early biological response of esophageal carcinoma cells after irradiation. Methods After 2, 4 and 8 h of irradiation with different doses (5, 10, 15 Gy) , the uptake ratio of 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT, survival, and ATP level of esophageal carcinoma cells were detected. Results After 2 and 4 h of 5 Gy irradiation, the cellular 18F-FDG uptake ratio was decreased by 9.45% and 16. 4%. After 2 h of 15 Gy irradiation, this uptake ratio was increased by 26.5% (t = 3.04, P 〈 O. 05). But the 18F-FDG uptake ratios of the other experimental groups were decreased remarkably (F =25.75, P 〈0. 05). On the other side, after 2 h of 5 Gy irradiation, the lSF- FLT uptake ratio had no statistically difference [ (3.65 +0. 17)% vs (4.00 -+0. 17)%, P 〉0. 05], and lSF-FLT uptake ratios of the other groups were decreased notably (F = 33.93, P 〈 O. 05). The relative survival of esophageal carcinoma cells after 2, 4 and 8 h of irradiation with different doses (5, 10, 15 Gy) has no significant difference. Line regression analysis indicated a significant correlation between 18F-FLT and ATP levels (r =0. 887, P 〈O. 05), whereas a less correlation was found between lSF-FDG and ATP levels (r = 0. 622, P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions Both lS F-FDG and 18F-FLT can evaluate the ultra-early irradiation response of esophageal carcinoma cells, but 18F-FLT may be more specific than 18F-FDG in monitoring the ultra-early irradiation response.
出处 《中华放射医学与防护杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期131-134,共4页 Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
基金 福建省自然科学基金(2008-59-11) 厦门市科技计划指导性项目(3502720077056)
关键词 18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖 18F-氟代脱氧胸腺嘧啶 食管癌细胞 生物学反应 18F-FDG 18F-FLT Esophageal carcinoma cells Biological response
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Clements DM, Bowrey DJ, Havard TJ. The role of staging investigations for oesophago-gastric carcinoma. EurJ Surg Oncol, 2004, 30(3) :309-412.
  • 2Westerterp M, van Westreenen HL, ReitsmaJB, et al. Esophageal cancer: CT, endoscopic US, and FDG PET for assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy-systematic review. Radiology, 2005, 236 ( 3 ) : 841-851.
  • 3张晓丽,曹国宪,俞惠新,金坚.延胡索乙素对人乳腺癌细胞MCF-7摄取~99Tc^m-MIBI的影响[J].中华核医学杂志,2006,26(5):313-313. 被引量:11
  • 4Herrmann K, Buck AK, Schuster T, et al. A pilot study to evaluate 3' -deoxy-3' - \8 F -fluorothymidine pet for initial and early response imaging in mantle cell lymphoma.J N uel Med, 2011, 52(12) :1898-1902.
  • 5李红梅,冯珏,张锦明,张建阳,李晓东,方凤宁,王亚平.18F—FLT及18F—FDG监测肺癌化疗后早期反应的动物实验[J].中华核医学杂志,2010(3):194-194. 被引量:6
  • 6Benz MR, CzerninJ, Allen-Auerbach MS, et al. 3' -deoxy-3'-[18FJ fluorothymidine positron emission tomography for response assessment in soft tissue sarcoma: a pilot study to correlate imaging findings with tissue thymidine kinase 1 and Ki-67 activity and histopathologic response. Cancer, 2012, 118 ( 12 ) : 3135-3144.
  • 7GiammarileF, Billotey C, Lombard-Bohas C, et al. 18F_FLT and 18 F -FDG positron emission tomography for the imaging of advanced well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic endocrine tumors. Nuel Med Commun, 2011,32(2) :91-97.
  • 8Troost EG, Vogel WV , Merkx MA, et al. 18 F - FL T PET does not discriminate between reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in primary head and neck cancer patients.J N ucl Med, 2007, 48 (5) :726-735.
  • 9谭业颖,田嘉禾,汤义军,张锦明,李善春,王朝阳,徐志英,林乐军.^(18)F-FLT与^(18)F-FDG评估化疗早期反应的细胞学研究[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2009,17(6):442-444. 被引量:3
  • 10王卉,田嘉禾,张锦明,李天然,曲宝林,陈英茂,刘健,王珊.18F-FLT体外监测结肠癌细胞早期放射反应[J].中华核医学杂志,2010(3):147-150. 被引量:4

二级参考文献25

  • 1谭业颖,田嘉禾,张锦明,姚树林,崔红英.^(18)F-FLT PET显像诊断肺单发结节及评价细胞增殖的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2007,27(2):65-67. 被引量:20
  • 2Been LB, Suurmeijer AJH, Cobben DCP, et al. [ ^18 F]FLT-PET in oncology: current status and opportunities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2004,31 : 1659.
  • 3Komberg A, Baker TA. Biosynthesis in DNA precursors. DNA replication. 2nd ed. New York W.H. Freeman,1992,53.
  • 4Pil PM, Lippard SJ. Specific binding of chromosomal protein HMG1 to DNA damaged by the anticaneer drug cisplatin. Science,1992,256:234.
  • 5Weber WA, Becker K, Dittler H J, et al. Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging, J Clin Oneol, 2001,19:3058.
  • 6Haberkorn U, Bellemann ME, Brix G, et al. Apoptosis and changes in glucose transport early after treatment of Morris hepaloma with gemeitabine. Eur J Nucl Med,2001,28 :418.
  • 7Fresno Vara JA, Casado E, de Castro J, et al. PI3K/Akt signalling pathway and cancer. Cancer Treat Rev,2004,30:193.
  • 8Burgman P, Odonoghue JA, Humm JL, et al. Hypoxia induced increase in FDG uptake in MCF7 cells. J Nucl Med,2001,42:170.
  • 9Karoline Spaepen, Sigrid Stroobants ,Patrick Dupont, et al. [ ^18F] FDG PET monitoring of tumour response to chemotherapy:does [ ^18F] FDG uptake correlate with the viable tnmour cell fraction? Eur J Nucl Med, 2003.30:682.
  • 10Mohiuddin M,Marks J,Marks G.Management of rectal cancer:short-vs long-course preoperative radiation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2008,72:636-643.

共引文献18

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部