期刊文献+

重视眼科与视光学仪器临床评估方法的合理选择 被引量:12

Evaluation of ophthalmology and optometry instruments: proper method selection
原文传递
导出
摘要 眼科与视光学仪器的合理运用,对相关疾病的诊治具有重要意义。仪器临床评估的主要内容包括仪器测量的精确性和准确性,精确性又包括测量的重复性和再现性评估2个方面,而准确性主要涉及仪器间的一致性比较。随着新技术和新仪器迅速发展,相关研究层出不穷,然而在评估方法的选择上亦暴露出不少问题。现就精确性和准确性评估的几种重要统计分析方法进行介绍,并分别举例说明其在临床科研中的合理选择和应用,同时讨论眼别选择和样本量计算对仪器评估的影响,以促进该类研究的规范化发展。 The proper uses of ophthalmic and optical instruments play an important role in diagnosis and treatment of eye diseases. Precision and accuracy assessment are the major indicator for evaluation of instruments. The former consists of repeatability and reproducibility, while the agreement assessment decides its accuracy. There are so many studies focused on this field due to the rapid development of new techniques and instruments, followed by the arising of problems in method selection. This article introduces the main methods of precision and accuracy assessment. And we also provide the ideas of proper method selection in clinical practice and research with examples. Moreover, we discussed the influence of analytic approach with one eye or two, as well as sample size calculation.
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期257-260,共4页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
关键词 仪器评估 统计学 医学 精确性 准确性 Instruments assessment Statistics,medical Precision Accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1British Standard Institution. Accuracy (trueness and precision) ofmeasurement methods and results : general principles anddefinitions. London : HMO,1994,BS ISO 5725 part 1.
  • 2British Standard Institution. Accuracy (trueness and precision) ofmeasurement methods and results: basic methods for thedetermination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standardmeasurement method. London: HMO,1994,BS ISO 5725 part 2.
  • 3Bland JM,Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessingagreement between two methods of clinical measurement.Lancet, 1986,1:307-310.
  • 4Bland JM , Altman DG. Measurement error. BMJ,1996,313 :744.
  • 5McAlinden C,Khadka J,Pesudovs K. Statistical methods forconducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision(repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry andophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt,2011,31:330-338.
  • 6Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, et al. Anteriorsegment biometry with the Pentacam : comprehensive assessmentof repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract RefractSurg,2008,34:103-113.
  • 7Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, et al. RepeatabilityPentacam corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg?2008,34:727-734.
  • 8Pesudovs K. Wavefront aberration outcomes of LASIK for highmyopia and high hyperopia. J Refract Surg,2005,21 :S508-512.
  • 9Lopez-Miguel A, Martinez-Almeida L, Gonzalez-Garcia MJ,et al.Precision of higher-order aberration measurements with a newPlacido-disk topographer and Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor.J Cataract Refract Surg, 2013 (39 : 242-249.
  • 10McAlinden C , Khadka J, Pesudovs K. A comprehensiveevaluation of the precision (repeatability and reproducibility)of the oculus pentacam HR. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2011,52:7731-7737.

二级参考文献18

  • 1陈玉平,刘雪琴,蔡德鸿.骨质疏松症知识问卷的信度和效度测定[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2005,11(3):339-341. 被引量:148
  • 2陈卉.Bland-Altman分析在临床测量方法一致性评价中的应用[J].中国卫生统计,2007,24(3):308-309. 被引量:217
  • 3李镒冲,李晓松.两种测量方法定量测量结果的一致性评价[J].现代预防医学,2007,34(17):3263-3266. 被引量:155
  • 4栾荣生.流行病学研究原理与方法[M].第4版.成都:四川大学出版社,2002.114-121.
  • 5Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies [J]. The Statistician, 1983, 32, 307- 317.
  • 6Howell, D. C. Statistical methods for psychology [M]. 2nd ed. Boston: Duxbury Press, 1987.
  • 7金丕焕.医学统计方法[M].第2版.上海:复旦大学出版社,2003.436.
  • 8Bland JM, Ahman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement [J]. Lancet, 1986, 1(8476) : 307-310.
  • 9Michel BeAdard, Nancy J. Martin, Paul Krueger, et al. Assessing Reproducibility of Data Obtained With Instruments Based on Continuous Measurements [J]. Experimental Aging Research. 2000, 26: 353-365.
  • 10J. Lee, D. Koh , C. N. Ong. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Compute [J]. Biol. Med. 1989, 19: 61-70.

共引文献263

同被引文献178

引证文献12

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部