摘要
目的:对卧位拔伸微调法与传统推拿治疗颈源性头痛的临床疗效进行观察、比较。方法:从CEH患者中选取153名,随机分为传统推拿组和拔伸微调组。分别将两组治疗前后的临床疗效、疼痛评分、活动度及疼痛频率、持续时间进行评估分析、比较。结果:传统推拿组有效率为84.21%;卧位拔伸组有效率为94.81%;两组治疗后较治疗前VAS疼痛评分、ROM活动度评分及疼痛频率、持续时间均有显著降低(P<0.01),而拔伸微调组较传统推拿组对于VAS及ROM评分及疼痛频率、持续时间改善更为明显(P<0.01)。结论:传统治疗方法及卧位拔伸微调法治疗CHE均有肯定的疗效,且卧位拔伸微调法疗效更佳。
Objective： To observe and compare the clinical effect of treating cervicogenic headache by the method of micro-regulating with lying traction and traditional tuina method. Methods： 153 patients with cervicogenic headache were selected and separated into micro-regulating with lying traction group and traditional tuina group. Analyses and comparison the clinical effect, VAS, ROM, frequency per week and the last pain time between the two groups. Results： The effective rate of traditional tuina group was 84.21%; the effective rate of micro-regulating with lying traction group was 94.81%. In two groups, VAS, ROM, frequency per week and the last pain time after treatment improved obviously （P〈0.01）, and in micro-regulating with lying traction group, the improvement was more obvious （P〈0.01）. Conclusion： The clinical effect of treating CEH by the the method of micro- regulating with lying traction and traditional tuina method was good, and the method of micro-regulating with lying traction was much better than the method of traditional tuina method.
出处
《中华中医药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第6期1914-1916,共3页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
拔伸微调法
推拿
颈源性头痛
Micro-regulating with lying traction method
Tuina
Cervicogenic headache
