期刊文献+

“恶债”理论与贷款方责任之完善:评《负责任的主权借贷行为原则》 被引量:1

"Odious Debt" Theory and the Perfection of Lenders Obligation:On "Principles on Promoting Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing"
原文传递
导出
摘要 "恶债"理论角度的分析表明,联合国贸易和发展会议《负责任的主权借贷行为原则》(下称"原则")的创举在于从程序角度规定贷款人在主权贷款中的尽职调查、主权债务重组责任,并对"恶债"的界定和"恶债"理论的适用有所发展。"原则"具有一定的国内法基础,可能会成为主权债务国履行偿债义务的抗辩理由和贷款人竞争的手段。作为新兴债权大国,我国有必要拓宽"原则"的关注视角,主张规范主权债券发行市场并在主权债务合同、对外发展援助机制和多边层面作出相应的安排。 The theoretical analysis of 'odious debt' shows that 'Principles on Promoting Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing'('Principles') of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development initiates the obligations of due diligence and sovereign debt restructuring for the lenders in sovereign loans from the procedural perspective.It develops the definition of 'odious debt' and the application of 'odious debt' theory.Drawn upon domestic laws,'Principles' may become a means of defense and lenders competing sovereign debtors to meet their debt obligations.As an emerging creditor,it is necessary for China to broaden the concern perspective of the 'Principles',to advocate norms of sovereign bond issuance market,and to make the appropriate arrangements in sovereign debt contracts,foreign development assistance mechanisms and multilateral levels.
作者 郭华春
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《上海金融》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期70-75,118,共6页 Shanghai Finance
基金 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2012BFX008) 中国博士后科学资金面上资助项目(2012M511070)阶段性成果
关键词 “恶债”理论 主权借贷 贷款人责任 合同 Odious Debt Sovereign Lending and Borrowing Lenders Obligation Contract
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1George W. Baker, Woodrow Wilson~s Use of the Non-Recognition Policy in Costa Rica, 22 AMERICAS 7 (1965).
  • 2Patrick Bolton & David Skeel, Odious Debts or Odious Regimes?, 70 LAW &CONTEMP. PROBS. 83 (Autumn 2007).
  • 3ALBERT H. CHOI and ERIC A. POSNER, A CRITIQUE OF THE ODIOUS DEBT, DOCTRINE, LAW AND CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS, Vol. 70:33,p.
  • 4Odette Lienau, Who is the "Sovereign" in Sovereign Debt? Reinterpreting a Rule-of-Law Frame- work from the Early Twentieth Century, 33 Yale J. Int'l L. 63 (2008),p.102.
  • 5Lee C. Buchheit et al., The Dilemma of Odious Debts, 56 Duke L.J. 1201, p.1226 (2007); Christiana O- choa, From Odious Debt to Odious Finance: Avoiding the Externalities of a Functional Odious Debt Doctrine, 49 Harv. Int'l L.J. 109, pp.156-157 (2008).
  • 6Michael Kremer, Seema Jayachandran and Jonathan Shafter: Applying the Odious Debts Doctrine while Preserving Legitimate Lending.
  • 7Moody's, Citing U.S. Concern, Cancels Ratings on Iran Debt, New York Times, 4 June 2002: 7, sect. W.
  • 8The Serbian Loans Case (France v Serbia), Judgment, 12 July 1929, PCIJ, Ser. A (1929), A20; Brazilian Loans Case (France v Brazil), Judgment, 12 July 1929, PCIJ, Set. A (1929), A21 before the Perma- nent Court of International Justice.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部