期刊文献+

手术夹闭和血管内介入治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤的疗效分析 被引量:10

Efficacy analysis of surgery and endovascular treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysms
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较显微外科手术与血管内介入治疗颅内动脉瘤的效果。方法对2004年7月至2012年6月我院收治的114例颅内动脉瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,其中行开颅夹闭52例共52个动脉瘤,行血管内栓塞治疗62例共66个动脉瘤。结果显微外科手术组恢复良好44例、功能障碍6例、死亡2例;血管内介入治疗组术后恢复良好56例、功能障碍4例、死亡2例。结论临床上应根据动脉瘤的位置、形态、大小、临床分级、单发或多发以及医生经验等多种因素综合考虑,选择个体化治疗方法。 Objective To compare the efficacy of surgery with interventional therapy for intracranial aneurysms.Methods Retrospectively analyze 114 intracranial aneurysm patients in our hospital from July 2004 to June 2012,craniotomy clipping for 52 aneurysms in 52 patients,and endovascular treatment 66 aneurysms in 62 patients.Results 44 patients recovered well,6 patients with dysfunction and 2 patients died in microsurgery group.56 patients recovered well,4 patients with dysfunction and 2 patients died in endovascular therapy group.Conclusion Individualized treatment should be chosen depending on the location,size,morphology,quantity,Hunt-Hess grading of aneurysms and the experience of doctors.
出处 《中国冶金工业医学杂志》 2013年第3期262-264,共3页 Chinese Medical Journal of Metallurgical industry
关键词 颅内动脉瘤 破裂 手术夹闭 栓塞 血管内介入治疗 Intracranial aneurysm Rapture Surgical clipping Embolism Endovascular treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

共引文献184

同被引文献66

  • 1陆海,郑晶.开颅手术与血管内介入治疗颅内动脉瘤疗效对比[J].中国继续医学教育,2013,5(3):7-9. 被引量:9
  • 2万刚,朱安林,陈锐锋,林成.颅内动脉瘤血管内介入栓塞治疗术中预防出血并发症的经验探讨[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2013,16(18):27-29. 被引量:21
  • 3贺昭忠,孟庆海,杨新生,张文德.颅内动脉瘤显微手术夹闭与介入治疗的对比研究[J].青岛医药卫生,2004,36(1):2-3. 被引量:2
  • 4王志刚,丁璇,曲春城,冀勇,张纪庆,李涛,王成伟,潘顺.手术夹闭和血管内介入治疗颅内破裂动脉瘤的疗效分析[J].中华神经外科杂志,2007,23(11):840-843. 被引量:23
  • 5Dehdashti AR,Mermillod B,Rufenacht DA,et al. Does treatmentmodality of intracranial ruptured aneurysms influence theincidence of cerebral vasospasm and clinical outcome. [ J ].Cerebrovasc Dis,2004,17(1) :53-60.
  • 6Rabinstein AA, Lanzino G, Wijdicks EF,et al. Multidisciplinarymanagement and emerging therapeutic strategies in aneurysmalsubarachnoid haemorrhage [ J ]. Lancet Neurol, 2010, 9(5):504-519.
  • 7詹思延.流行病学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:367.
  • 8Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Stratton I, et al. International subarachn-oid aneurysm trial ( ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versusendovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranialaneurysms : a randomized comparison of effects on survival,dependency,seizures,rebleeding,subgroups,and aneurysmocclusion[ J]. Lancet,2005,366(9488) :809-817.
  • 9Hoh BL, Curry WT, Carter BS,et al. Computed tomographic de-monstrated infarcts after surgical and endovascular treatment ofaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage [ J ]. Acta Neurochir(Wien) ,2004,146(11) :1177-1183.
  • 10Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H, et al. Outcomes of earlyendovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebralaneurysms. A prospective randomized study [ J ]. Stroke, 2000,31(10):2369-2377.

引证文献10

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部