摘要
基于地租理论分析了农地非农化过程中地租增值来源:自然增值、资本投入增值及超额需求引致的虚拟地租,其中后二者占据了地租增值的大部分。地方政府获得了第一次地租增值收益,房地产企业获得了社会平均利润和第二次地租增值收益,农民及农民集体获得农业地租。郑州市惠济区的案例表明:农民及农民集体、地方政府和房地产企业分别获得地租增值部分的0.6%、58.8%和40.6%。由此说明当前的农地非农化地租增值收益分配机制存在不少问题,应当以土地供给制度改革为首,建立与之相匹配的财税制度来优化农地地租增值收益分配机制。
The conversion process of farmland generates enormous land rent value-added incomes,and the allocation of the incomes becomes the core issue of the conversion.Based on the land rent theory,the paper analyzes the sources of land rent value-added incomes during the process of farmland conversion： namely natural value-added,capital investment value-added and the virtual land rent derived from excess demand,among which the latter two occupy most of the land rent value-added.Local governments obtain the first land rent value-added benefit,real estate enterprises obtain the average profit of the community and the second land rent value-added benefit,and farmers and farmers＇ collectives obtain the agricultural rent.The case analysis of Zhengzhou Huiji District shows that： farmers and farmers＇ collectives obtain 0.6% part of the value-added rent,while the government and real estate companies obtain 58.8% and 40.6% respectively.The current distribution mechanism of rent value-added incomes from the non-agriculturalization of farmland has caused a series of problems.It suggests that the land supply system should be first reformed,and the finance and tax system matching it should be established in order to optimize the distribution mechanism of land rent value-added incomes.
出处
《广东商学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期79-84,共6页
Journal of Guangdong University of Business Studies
基金
教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(09YJC790099)
关键词
地租增值
农地非农化
收益分配
利益主体
land rent value-added
the non-agriculturalization of farmland
income allocation
stakeholder
