摘要
以笔者长期检索经验为基础,以抽样检索结果为依据,将CALIS与国图OPAC书目检索结果进行对比分析。检索结果表明,二者书目数据质量高,值得肯定;存在的差异,各有特色。二者的共同问题是数据不规范、不一致。建议实行统一的编目规则,并严格执行,遵循以用户为中心的原则,以便于书目信息资源共享。
Based on the long-term search experience and the sampling search results,this article performs a comparative analysis on bibliographic search results between CALIS（China Academic Library Information System） and OPAC system of National Library of China.The search results show that the bibliographic data are high-quality and should be affirmed and the differences between them have their own characteristics.The common problem of them is that the bibliographic data is not standardized and consistent.This article proposes to carry out unified cataloging rules and strictly execute and follow the user-centric principle so as to share bibliographic information resources.
出处
《高校图书馆工作》
CSSCI
2013年第3期71-73,共3页
Library Work in Colleges and Universities
