期刊文献+

技术选择、投入强度与企业创新绩效研究 被引量:47

Technology choice,input intensity,and enterprise innovation performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 企业创新中的技术选择是不是越先进越好?企业创新中的投入强度是不是越强越好?本文在适宜技术理论框架下,通过大样本的中国本土制造业企业数据,对这一问题进行了探索性研究。通过实证检验发现:(1)在控制企业创新投入强度的情况下,企业创新的技术水平与创新绩效之间呈现出倒"U"型关系;(2)在控制企业创新技术水平的情况下,企业创新投入强度与创新绩效之间也呈现出倒"U"型关系。因此,过度强调创新技术的先进性以及创新投入的高强度不利于企业创新绩效的提高。企业创新活动必须遵循比较优势战略,通过促进企业自生能力的提升,实现创新绩效的最大化。 Whether more advanced technology choice is better for enterprise innovation? Whether stronger input intensity is better for enterprise innovation? Based on the theoretical framework of appropriate technology, some exploratory research on these issues is carried out by using a large sample data of Chinese domestic enterprises in the manufacturing sector. Through empirical test, it is found that (I) under the control of the input intensity in enterprise innovation, there is also an inverted "U" -shaped relation-ship between the level of innovative technology and innovation performance; (2) under the control of the technical level of enter-prise innovation, there is also an inverted "U" -shaped relationship between the input intensity in enterprise innovation and in-novation performance. Therefore, over emphasis on the advance ness of technology and the high intensity of innovation input does not conduce to the improvement of innovation performance. Entrepreneurial innovation activity must follow a comparative advan-tage strategy to maximize the innovation performance through the promotion of the self-generated ability.
作者 康志勇
机构地区 扬州大学商学院
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期42-49,共8页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"集群与联盟双重嵌入 共生耦合下战略性新兴产业的培育演化机制研究"(批准号71103155) 江苏省教育厅项目"技术选择与中国特色自主创新道路研究:以江苏为例"(批准号2012SJB790049)
关键词 技术选择 适宜技术 投入强度 创新绩效 technology choice appropriate technology input intensity innovation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Lee, J. and Shim, E. Moderating effects of R&D on corpo- rate growth in U.S. and Japanese hi - tech industries : an em- pirical study [ J ]. The Journal of High Technology Manage- ment Research, 1995,6 : 179 - 191.
  • 2Hall, B. H. and Oriani, R. Does the market value R&D in- vestment by European finns? Evidence from a panel manufac- turing firms in France, Germany, and Italy [J]. International Journal d Industrial Organization, 2006, 24:971 -993.
  • 3Ayadi, O. F. , Dufrene, U. B. and Obi, C. P. Finn per- formartce measures: temporal roadblocks to innovation? [ J]. Managerial Finanle, 1996, 22:18 -32.
  • 4Huang, C. J. and Liu, C. J. Exploration for the relation ship between innovation, IT and pcrfonnanee J. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2005, 6 : 237 - 252.
  • 5Ming - Liang Yell, Hsiao - Ping Chu, Peter Sher, Yi - Chia Chiu. R&D intensity, firm performance and the identification of the threshold : fresh evidence from the panel threshold re- gression model[J]. Applied Economics, 2010, 42(3) : 389 -401.
  • 6Hu, Albert, G.. z. Ownership, Government R&D, Private R&D, and Productivity in Chinese Industry [ J ]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2001,29( 1 ) : 136 - 157.
  • 7吴延兵.R&D与生产率——基于中国制造业的实证研究[J].经济研究,2006,41(11):60-71. 被引量:402
  • 8李小平,朱钟棣.国际贸易、R&D溢出和生产率增长[J].经济研究,2006,41(2):31-43. 被引量:472
  • 9朱有为,徐康宁.中国高技术产业研发效率的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(11):38-45. 被引量:616
  • 10张海洋.我国工业R&D生产效率和影响因素——基于省级大中型工业数据的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2008,26(5):970-978. 被引量:34

二级参考文献182

共引文献8381

同被引文献784

引证文献47

二级引证文献566

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部