期刊文献+

MTT法测定人表皮癌细胞的抗药性 被引量:9

Determination of Multidrug Resistance of Human KB Carcinoma Cells by MTT Colorimetric Assay
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在用MTT测定细胞存活率以研究人表皮癌细胞KB-3-1 及其抗阿霉素细胞株KB-A-1对化疗药物阿霉素、长春花碱和秋水仙碱的多药抗性时,发现培养基中血清浓度的变化对MTT法测定结果有影响。吸光值在血清浓度为w = 0.02 时最高,w = 0.30 时最低,w = 0.05~0.20 之间波动不大。而不加血清使甲酉尤溶解困难而产生误差。培养基中的血清(常为w = 0.10)不影响MTT法的结果,在完全培养基中用MTT法测定了两株细胞的抗药性。KB-A-1 对阿霉素、长春花碱和秋水仙碱的相对抗药性分别为KB-3-1 的176、45 和137 倍。MTT法可简便地用于抗癌药物的筛选。 To determine the relative resistances of KB A 1 cells to the parent cell line KB 3 1,MTT colorimetric assay was used to evaluate the cell growth and survival.In the experiment,It was found that the serum can affect the result of MTT assay,and the optical density reached the maximum with the serum concentration of w =0.02,and the minimum with w =0.30.While at the concentrations between w =0.05~0.20 it fluctuated a little.When no serum was added,the formazan product could not be easily dissolved and the error was inevitably introduced.So,in the ordinary range around w =0.10,the addition of serum to the reaction medium will not cause error to the MTT assay and the experiment can be done easily.This MTT assay was used to perform drug sensitivity assays of KB 3 1 and its drug resistant mutant,KB A 1.The relative resistances of KB A 1 to colchicine,vinblastine and adriamycin are 137,45 and 167 respectively compared with KB 3 1.
出处 《华东理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2000年第1期103-106,共4页 Journal of East China University of Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金!资助项目(39680032) 国家科委医药技术创新博士项目
关键词 MTT法 多药抗性 肿瘤 化疗药物 MTT colorimetric assay serum cell viability chemotherapeutical drug
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1Shen D W,J Biolo Chem,1986年,261卷,17期,7762页
  • 2Denizot F,J Immuno Methods,1986年,89卷,2期,271页

同被引文献51

  • 1张秀珍.现代临床微生物学检测[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.197.
  • 2Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival :application to proliferation and cytoxicity assay [ J]. J Immun Meth, 1983,65 ( 1 ) : 55 - 63.
  • 3Carmichrel J, De Graft WG. Evaluation of a terayolium based seminautomated cnlorimetvlc assay: Assessment of chemosensitivity testing[ J]. Cancer Res, 1987,47 (4) : 936 - 939.
  • 4李影林.中华医学检验全书(下卷)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997:2212.
  • 5Florian M, Freimoser, Claude A, et al. Applied and Envirobmental Microbiology [ J ]. 1999,65 ( 8 ) : 3 727 - 2 729.
  • 6薛彬 EdemanA ThorbeckeGJ.介绍一种用颜色显示法测细胞的生长与增殖.北京医科大学学报,1987,19(2):125-127.
  • 7Arseculeratne SN, Alapattu DN. The assessment of the viability of the endospores of Rhinosporidium seeberi with MTT ( 3 - 4,5 - dimethyl - 2 - thiazolyl - 2,5 - diphenyl - 2H - tetrazolium bromide) [ J ]. Mycological Research,2004,108 ( 12 ) : 1 423 - 1 430.
  • 8Cetin Y, Bullerman LB. Cytotoxicity of Fusarium mycotoxins to mammalian cell cultures as determined by the MTF hioassay [ J ]. Food chemical Tocicology. 2005,43 (5) : 755 - 764.
  • 9Arseculeratne SN, Atapattu DN.The assessment of the viability of the endospores of Rhinosporidium seeberi with MTT[3-(4,5-dimethyl-2- thiazolyl-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide)][J].Mycol Res, 2004,108(12) : 1423.
  • 10[2]Kawada K,Yonei T,Ueoka H,et al.Comparison of chemosensitivity tests:clonogenic assay versus MTT assay[J].Acta Med Okayama,2002,56(3):129-134.

引证文献9

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部