期刊文献+

学前准教师教育信息化态度研究 被引量:8

下载PDF
导出
摘要 学前教育信息化在我国已经开始起步。学前教师作为学前教育信息化的主导因素,他们对学前教育信息化的态度很大程度上影响着学前教育信息化的推进。研究以学前专业学生为对象,对台湾"幼儿数字学习态度量表"进行了修订,并开展问卷调查。研究探讨了学前准教师关于学前教育信息化的整体态度,重点分析了不同个人背景因素对被试学前教育信息化态度的差异情形,并对分析结果进行了讨论。
作者 蔡建东 张媛
出处 《电化教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第7期33-39,共7页 E-education Research
基金 教育部人文社科青年基金项目"幼儿教育软件发展适宜性评价研究"(项目编号:11YJC880002)
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1教育部.教育信息化十年发展规划(2011-2020年)[DB/OL].http://www.ceiea.com/html/201109/20110913154542p7fz.shtml,2012-03-03.
  • 2方郁琳.幼儿与电脑:优势?劣势?[J].空中大学社会科学学报,1999,(7):93.116.
  • 3方颢璇.幼儿用电脑好不好?[J].幼儿咨询,2003,154:2-10.
  • 4陈儒晰,邱方晞.幼儿教保人员的幼儿数字学习态度之研究:以幼儿保育系学生为例[C].南台湾幼儿保育学术研讨会论文,美和技术学院幼儿保育系,2007.
  • 5温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194. 被引量:1288
  • 6Barker,P.. Using Intranets to Support Teaching and Learning [J]. Innovations in Education and Training International, 1999,(1) :3.10.
  • 7Cassady, J. C.. Student and Instructor Perceptions of the Efficacy of Computer-Aided Lectures in Undergraduate University Courses[J]. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1998, (2) ; 175-189.
  • 8Dewhurst,D. G.,Macleod, H. A.,Norris, T. A. M.. Independent Student Learning Aided by Computers: An Acceptable Alternativeto Lectures. [JJComputers & Education, 2000, (3) :223-241.
  • 9Novak, J. D.. Meaningful Learning: The Essential Factor for Con Conceptual Change in Limited or Inappropriate PropositionalHierarchies Leading to Empowerment of Learners [J]. Science Education,2002, (4) :548.571.
  • 10Sloane,A.. Learning with the Web: Experience of Using the World Wide Web in A Learn Environment [J], Computers & Education,1997,(4): 207-212.

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1312

同被引文献65

引证文献8

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部